Wishbone: 1) Not going to happen.
2) A more likely scenario is that Microsoft makes Win3.1 freeware. If they do charge for it, they'll charge more than $6 per license, I'm sure.
3) The source code most likely no longer exists, and even if it did, that's just too much work for a $6 game.
Because that's not the business GOG is in, and because it would be a gargantuan task. You don't just recreate an OS. Such a project would take years. Just ask QBix.
SLP2000: ad 2 - They could agree for a % of the game sold with Win 3.1. It would be a good deal for Microsoft, they would get money for nothing. And I don't believe in freeware.
Whether or not such a move would make sense to you and me is entirely beside the point. I very much doubt that Microsoft would agree to such a deal. Plus, it would mean less profits for GOG. Remember, the publishers still have to have their cut as well.
And you don't
believe in freeware? What do you mean? You don't believe it exists, or you don't believe it
should exist?
SLP2000: ad 3 - GOG was looking ppl to revert hardcoding (which I believe should give them source code), so they have somthing similar in mind.
I can tell you're not a programmer. It's one thing to decompile a program to some sort of low-level code, for the purpose of finding a few specific calls to some sort of DRM solution and redirecting them. It's quite another to attempt to port that code in its entirety to a different platform than it was written for.