sunshinecorp: Actually, to be a stickler, the word "sexism" only has negative meaning.
The GA itself is not sexist because it's just a fuckin' GA.
Vestin: The word has a negative
connotation.
The obvious problem with what you're suggesting is that we'd be arbitrarily disregarding the fact that something fits the dictionary definition just because we dislike the fact that it's associated with being something wrong.
"Sexist" isn't defined as "discriminating based on sex and BAD". The "bad" part comes from the fact that in a hell of a lot of cases that IS something bad. Not so here, but that doesn't mean that we should insist the term doesn't fit all of a sudden.
On the other hand - some people adore abusing this ambiguity to imply that things are bad just because they objectively fit a definition of something that is considered derogatory. I simply refuse to believe that the right course of action is to deny that a term has been used correctly purely because we don't want it apply in a particular case.
Word Origin and History for sexist
adj.
1965, from sex (n.) on model of racist, coined by Pauline M. Leet, director of special programs at Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, U.S., in a speech which was circulated in mimeograph among feminists. Popularized by use in print in Caroline Bird's introduction to "Born Female" (1968)
sexism
Syllabification: sex·ism
Pronunciation: /ˈsekˌsizəm
/
noun
Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.
Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex: sexism in language is an offensive reminder of the way the culture sees women
Since we wanted dictionary definitions... :P
What ambiguity? It's a word. That was created to describe something entirely negative. Exactly like racism. Unless you want to tell me that racism is misunderstood as well.
Vestin: The word has a negative
connotation.
[...]
"Sexist" isn't defined as "discriminating based on sex and BAD". The "bad" part comes from the fact that in a hell of a lot of cases that IS something bad. Not so here, but that doesn't mean that we should insist the term doesn't fit all of a sudden.
Potzato: Exactly. For instance, making different clothes for men or women is sexist. But there is nothing wrong here, on a general level it is accepted.
The same could be said with 'parity', 'equality' and 'fairness' as these notions arose in thread earlier.
Making a GA for women only is fair. It would have been unfair to open it for everyone and giving favor to women (and yes, the irony is amusing).
Making another one for men enforces parity.
Having less women than men for the same prizes in each GA makes respective odds unequal ; but it has nothing to do with parity or fairness.
The important fact is that it is a GA, I mean it's a one way street. The matter would have been different for a trade or a sale.
See above. And I'm not calling this GA sexist btw. Far from it. I'm only replying to the fact that "sexist" cannot have a possitive connotation.