The Globe and Mail says so in this rather jejune article that doesn't even come close to addressing the issue of budget cuts bankrupting the schools of kinaesthetic learning techniques.

"Girls also often have prettier writing and are better at colouring within the lines."

Yeah. You've just all credibility there, article.

Well, the female brain IS smaller. Thats not news.

And I think their rib cage is smaller as well, or has less ribs or something. Lots of useful and sometimes useless facts one often picks up in science class, eh what?

To be fair, ours fits in our penis.

ALL DAT STUFF WENT TO DA TITTIES AMIRIGHT? LOLROCKZORZ!

I only picked up the useless ones. :(

That makes me wonder, given how boorish most women seem to be, where precisely is their brain? I mean they haven't got a penis to think with.

Ouch. lol

Speaking as a girl.

Eh well, around here the only women actually interested in dating have a tendency to behave in a boorish manner, that would be just as bad were they to have a penis. It's just that men generally have at least the sense of decorum to actually give the object of their misguided affection a chance to say no.

And no, I'm not at all bitter, why do you wonder?

No.

Thought usually, I hear it the other way round, because of that stupid damn Adam and Eve story.

That means we men should take over the planet again, stop the covert bullshit, and start some WARS! ... Oh wait, that wouldn't change anything

Nah you're not, way too much self-esteem.

Just kidding.

... or am I?

Good things come in small packages. *cue jokes about male anatomy*

Well, I guess you could say that I've sat through one too many feminist propaganda lectures in the form of "sex discrimination education."

It would be nice though, to be keeping the hands to themselves though, is it really that unreasonable to ask before touching?

As for your point, the problem there is that it tends to be harder to make note of lack of bad behavior than conspicuously obvious bad behavior.