It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Sachys: IF the donors agree to it after a certain period of "limbo" or their donations
perfectly fine with me , after all keys i gave should be used :)
I think it would just be easier for you guys if you raised the number of games a person could win to 2 and the number they could be in for to 3 to increase turnover. Then have a fire sale giveaway with keys that are (insert time period) old where people can ask for whatever. Or just cut off donations at a certain point. Say take only 20-30 keys a week at first. Then only accept donations up to the amount of games you gave away.
avatar
Sachys: so... you dont want the game?
avatar
Spinorial: Nope, sorry for the confusion. I was trying to make a thinly veiled statement at just how much work you guys make for yourselves ;)
^gay for thinly veiled statements! ;)
avatar
theslitherydeee: I think it would just be easier for you guys if you raised the number of games a person could win to 2 and the number they could be in for to 3 to increase turnover. Then have a fire sale giveaway with keys that are (insert time period) old where people can ask for whatever. Or just cut off donations at a certain point. Say take only 20-30 keys a week at first. Then only accept donations up to the amount of games you gave away.
then do your own bloody giveaway. all of these points have been thought out already, discussed, backtracked and pre-rendered.
...and im a bit sick of you just trolling this thread right now in all honesty.

Edit: and a lot of what you suggest is what went wrong with ninja thread.
Post edited June 10, 2014 by Sachys
avatar
Sachys: * * * * *

Experiment #1

* * * * *

Due to the influx of games, it occured to foxworks and myself that we need a higher turnover of gifting.
So, to see if it will work or not, I'm putting up a couple of my own codes for what may end up as the GA "bonus quickfire rounds" on the days when the GA is closed - IF the donors agree to it after a certain period of "limbo" or their donations

RULES:

Basically the same as the OP in terms of rep / joindate / forum participation.
Just state: "IN" as a reply to this post if you'd like the game.
I'll return later on - or foxworks will do the draw dependent on the time.

Minimum five entrants.

* * * * *

Offered: FLY'N - Steam - http://store.steampowered.com/app/223730/ - a platformy puzzle ting innit!
In. Game trailer looks interesting.
okay. evidently the idea failed due to some wantiong to troll via pm as well. will draw now to keep the bargain.

if i told you to "fuck off!" - do so. had enough of wakalo flavoured shit for one month!

winner inbound!

edit: random.org results:

naer
warehall
daynov


DyNaer wins! PM inbound.

Experiment failiure!

FUCK ALL Y'ALL!
Post edited June 10, 2014 by Sachys
FLY'N is my kind of game... So I have it already! Thanks for the bonus GA, and congrats to DyNaer! :D
Post edited June 10, 2014 by genkicolleen
avatar
tomyam80: Hmm, seems there is some confusion & misunderstanding here including me. Cos the way i read it if he's the only qualifying entrant then shdn't he be the only winner of the giveaway? Besides, from my understanding of the OP, this part:

"*Pick a maximum of TWO games - one you really WANT, the other you are merely INTERESTED in. State which is which even if you only enter for one game.
Entries not in this format will be ignored! "

I think i hv followed & stg83 didn't so i'm really dunno if i read wrongly or something. Anyway, i'm ok with whoever win cos it's up 2 the giver 2 decide, just thought if the OP was clearer it may helped prevent any entrant from not qualifing. That's all. :)
avatar
justanoldgamer: I wondered about that too but then realized that the search on your name only showed 4 posts and all of them are about trying to win games. That does not really qualify as a month's activity. One of the reasons the ninja thread was eventually locked is that some people are only on the forum to get free games. On the other hand the search function is not very good and maybe it's missing tons of post where you participate daily in non giveaway thread.
Oh i see. Well, that was the prob. I wasn't very sure wat exactly qualify as a month's activity but i figured i was on the forum 4 @ least a month b4 this post so i thought i would qualify. Like i said earlier, if the rules or OP was clearer i think it would helped prevent any entrant from not qualifying. So in this case maybe i shd refrained from joining this giveaway till i'm deem 'worthy' perhaps. IMHO however, i dun feel it's wrong just 2 ask 4 games only as long as the givers r willing & the person really 1s 2 play the game. It's willing giver willing taker isn't it? As long as it's not forcing or begging others 4 the games. I only enter in giveaways 4 games that i would like 2 play & only do so in giveaways threads so i take it i'm acting in accordance with forum policy. Of cos if i can i hope 2 be a more active contributor on this forum in future, non-giveaway threads included. Thks 4 clarifying as well. :)
Post edited June 11, 2014 by tomyam80
Please note, we're a day early...again. Week 3's giveaway is here!

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_bizarrely_bonza_bonanza_bazaar_of_bazookery_giveaway_3/post1

...with slightly revised/updated rules. Don't hold back, participate, and let's make a dent in this list. It has grown even more since last time!
avatar
foxworks: Please note, we're a day early...again. Week 3's giveaway is here!

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_bizarrely_bonza_bonanza_bazaar_of_bazookery_giveaway_3/post1

...with slightly revised/updated rules. Don't hold back, participate, and let's make a dent in this list. It has grown even more since last time!
how are we a day early?
avatar
Sachys: how are we a day early?
I thought Thursday was to be launch lay, though we've just went with Wednesday cuz we're so damn efficient ;-)

EDIT: *launch day
Post edited June 11, 2014 by foxworks
avatar
Sachys: how are we a day early?
avatar
foxworks: I thought Thursday was to be launch lay, though we've just went with Wednesday cuz we're so damn efficient ;-)

EDIT: *launch day
no... we changed it to wednesday right from the start... whoch effectively makes you a day behind and therefore absurdly inefficient.

*deducts sandwich privaledges
Post edited June 11, 2014 by Sachys
avatar
Sachys: no... we changed it to wednesday right from the start... whoch effectively makes you a day behind and therefore absurdly inefficient.

*deducts sandwich privaledges
*scratches head and looks at memo

Do I keep my biscuits at least?
avatar
Sachys: no... we changed it to wednesday right from the start... whoch effectively makes you a day behind and therefore absurdly inefficient.

*deducts sandwich privaledges
avatar
foxworks: *scratches head and looks at memo

Do I keep my biscuits at least?
*points at tupperware of shame. shakes head.
avatar
Sachys: IF the donors agree to it after a certain period of "limbo" or their donations
Good idea! Not that the giveaways takes longer than the next insomnia.
avatar
foxworks: I thought Thursday was to be launch lay, though we've just went with Wednesday cuz we're so damn efficient ;-)

EDIT: *launch day
avatar
Sachys: no... we changed it to wednesday right from the start... whoch effectively makes you a day behind and therefore absurdly inefficient.

*deducts sandwich privaledges
Is a privaledge some kind of small, thin platform that foxworks gets to sit upon whilst eating said sandwich, or did you mean privilege? ;-)