TheCheese33: I've heard rumors that the director didn't even finish reading past the first few chapters in the book (which, if true, is incredibly arrogant and hilarious).
Oh come on, of course he read it, and (given his background) obviously hated it for the fascist drivel that it is. Otherwise, he'd hardly put together such a brilliant parody of everything the book is about. Stating he didn't even read it was a joke, just to mess up with the legions of upset fans some more. Verhoeven is a very cynical person.
doccarnby: Although, thinking about it, I think that's the only Heinlein book I've ever finished. I've started reading Stranger in a Strange Land and Number of the Beast (that was him, right?), and never finished either of them. Maybe it's his writing style?
His writing style, together with his fascinating fluidity of opinions. Heavily jingoist in the 1950s (Starship Troopers), then apparently discovering sex and advocating free love (Stranger in a Strange Land) very early after that in the 1960s and eventually settling on increasingly creepy tales full of naked people and incest in the 1970s. Seriously, the second half of Number of the Beast is just people having sex with each other, in all possible combinations. It's not only bad literature, it's pretty bad sci-fi, too.
Puppet Masters was decent, though. I'll give him that.