OneFiercePuppy: No, of course not. But it would have been better if they'd released it in the same way they released Starcraft over a decade ago: complete, with the campaign for all three races, and if they needed an expansion pack, it would tell the story across all three perspectives. They came close with that one thing you do optionally, but only got halfway there, and even that was halfassed and brief.
So, you're saying that for Starcraft 2 to be a proper game, it needs to have a separate campaign for all the three races from the get-go, mostly just because the first one was like that? Does this apply to other games as well?
OneFiercePuppy: There's a big, big difference between those who suggest that the game is totally finished and Blizzard is letting it trickle out a bit at a time (but given the *engine* is the same for all three, there's the requisite kernel of truth to make the lie all the better) and those who are pissed that they're asked to pay $150+ and wait three years for a game that, when all's said and done, looks like it'll be exactly as long and exactly as balanced as the first game was ten years ago.
I think it's a bit too much to get pissed at being asked to pay a lot of money for a game and its expansion packs. Sure, for all I know, they might be stalling to get people eager to dish out the cash, but I see no reason to get angered by it even if it is true. I also don't get what you mean by "having to wait 3 years"; do you mean the wait after the announcement, or the wait for the expansion packs or something entirely else?
As I recall it, Starcraft 1 campaign was pretty short, and at times boring.
OneFiercePuppy: But by all means. Make your strawman and flail wildly at it.
I answered in a trying so hard to be witty fashion to someone who had just made an extreme claim without backing it up, thinking it was all in good humor. This strawman bit makes it seem like I might've been mistaken about that last part (do correct me if my doubts are baseless).
*flails wildly*