lowyhong: Anyone feel that the exact opposite of the OP? I mean we're getting pretty new games here ever since the initial launch. I understand "old" is completely subjective to one's perspective, but what got me interested in GOG at first was the promise of really old games, like Wasteland or the Realms of Arkania games
Not that getting gems like BG&E or Painkiller is ever a bad thing, but I think that the distinction of GOG as a unique platform for distributing retro games is blurring with the other digital platforms, like Steam or GamersGate
Yeah, as I said in another thread. Aside from the no-DRM-thing (which I'm not convinced is so important for the general gamer as many would like to think - just look at Steam's success), what makes GOG unique and interesting is the old games it offers that you normally can't get anywhere else. This is also what the GOG-people tend to advertise in interviews - here's an example from the recent Eurogamer-interview:
"Lukasz Kukawski: First of all let's reveal what GOG means - it is an acronym for Good Old Games. GOG.com is a digital distribution platform that supplies all old-school games fans with DRM-free and dirt-cheap PC classics. What's even better is that you don't have to worry that your computer won't run those games, because our programmers optimise all GOG.com titles to run smoothly on both Windows Vista and XP operation systems. The games catalogue offers almost 100 titles including such hits from the past century like
Fallout, Duke Nukem 3D, Simon the Sorcerer, Unreal, Earthworm Jim, Freespace and more."
[url=]http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/good-old-games-interview[/url]