It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I want to know WHY are gymnospermous plants gymnospermous?
This question / problem has been solved by Sielleimage
Quoth Wikipedia:
It is widely accepted that the gymnosperms originated in the late Carboniferous period. This appears to have been the result of a whole genome duplication event around 319 million years ago. Early characteristics of seed plants were evident in fossil progymnosperms of the late Devonian period around 380 million years ago. It has been suggested that during the mid-Mesozoic era, pollination of some extinct groups of gymnosperms were by extinct species of scorpionflies that had specialized proboscis for feeding on pollination drops. The scorpionflies likely engaged in pollination mutualisms with gymnosperms, long before the similar and independent coevolution of nectar-feeding insects on angiosperms.
Simply put, because it's not necessary for them to not be. The seeds themselves don't require the protection of the ovary, nor are they required for proliferation of the plant.

It's a simple trait that started out as a random mutation that didn't hamper the plants ability to survive so it spread. Remember that not all mutations have to be beneficial, they just have to NOT be detrimental to the survival of an organism.
Post edited June 22, 2011 by Sielle
Difference Between website
avatar
Fenixp: I want to know WHY are gymnospermous plants gymnospermous?
The standard hypothesis is that the gymnospermous ("naked", as in "not coated", seed) condition is primitive. All the earliest known vascular plants are gymnosperms. The angiosperms developed later (probably before 125-130 MYA), with such suddenness that Darwin called their appearance in the fossil record an "abominable mystery". What we don't know is which gymnosperms were their ancestors; it's now presumed that they developed out of a long-extinct branch.

The more interesting question is what factors caused angiosperms to become dominant so suddenly. This question has generated a lot of interesting hypotheses, from "because coated seeds lend themselves to being distributed by animals" to "because dinosaurs didn't know how to eat them".
avatar
Sielle: Simply put, because it's not necessary for them to not be. The seeds themselves don't require the protection of the ovary, nor are they required for proliferation of the plant.

It's a simple trait that started out as a random mutation that didn't hamper the plants ability to survive so it spread. Remember that not all mutations have to be beneficial, they just have to NOT be detrimental to the survival of an organism.
This is a point which a bears repeating. Sometimes things like that happen because there's a reason for it, and sometimes they happen because they just happened and nothing has come along to prevent it.

Take the black squirrel, there's no particular reason for it to exist, but the melanistic subgroup isn't sufficiently damaging to it that you do see them pop up from time to time. And apparently in a few areas they're the dominant sub group rather than the more typical eastern grey.