It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Grab a front seat--this is one wild ride you will never forget

Finally, the trilogy is complete: GOG.com brings Rollercoaster Tycoon 3 back to your PCs in a definitive digital bundled-with-extras DRM-free package with the Soaked! and Wild! add-ons, all for just $19.99.

Rollercoaster Tycoon 3: Platinum! is a construction and management simulator, in which the player runs an amusement park by building rides, managing finances, hiring staff, and keeping the “peeps” happy. The game features career mode, in which players complete predesigned scenarios, and new sandbox mode where you can literally spend days and weeks designing the greatest roller coaster PC monitors have ever witnessed. The game utilizes full 3D graphics; that not only means you can rotate the camera and zoom in/out on your guests and amusement rides, but also allows you to use the CoasterCam and cruise along with your thrill-ride visitors.

Rollercoaster Tycoon 3 is all the best from its genre--it’s beautiful to watch, accessible but challenging, enormously entertaining, and incredibly detailed when it comes to managing rides, buildings, salaries, prices, and fees. In addition to that, RCT3 packs a few new elements, like a day/night cycle, creating your own fireworks, adding your own mp3 music to the background, and creating your own groups of visitors. This is a tremendous addition to the series, especially since the Wild! and Soaked! add-ons are included.

Run the greatest amusement park in gaming history, available now on GOG.com for $19.99.
low rated
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Now I wish I hadn't voted for getting newer games on GOG on that survey that they gave us.
I'd rather not have newer games on GOG (or any game) if they're going exceed the $9.99 price for old games.
After all, I can simply buy them from Steam and typically for much cheaper.
I don't have a particularly huge issue with DRM either, but I was willing to support GOG on principle.
If GOG deviates from their principles then I guess I will also refrain from buying on principle.
I don't like you much.
avatar
ETOX: I don't like you much.
No love lost.
this thread has turned really stupid in the last half hour
Post edited May 01, 2012 by CaptainGyro
avatar
Whitewraith: And please Do not compare retail to digital
avatar
jamyskis: Why not? There's no disc, no packaging, so if anything retail should be more expensive with additional overheads, and yet the game is available in practically every country with PC games in retail for half the price.

Hell, in Germany the whole lot is available for 10 euros in every store in town. I saw it in the UK for even less than that.

While I find the $20 price point as a general possibility for certain titles appealing, I'm less than enamoured with the way it has been used to date. Assassin's Creed, HOMM5 Complete and RT3 Deluxe are all twice what they cost at retail. Fine if you can't get them on disc in your respective country, but there is absolutely no compelling reason to get them otherwise.

To add insult to injury, the Deluxe version of RT3 on CD is completely copy-protection free, so you don't even need the disc in the drive once installed.
To me its like arguing over delivered pizza and frozen pizza (digital and retail) if you want to have a discussion over the unfairness of digital vs retail there is merit there but to compare them when GOG announces a new release and saying its a rip off compared to some bargain bin retail store price is to me like comparing the price of a delivered pizza vs a frozen pizza. There both the same but different.
In a perfect world digital should be cheaper because of all the reasons you say but it is not how it is PC game makers created a system where digital is more money (usually) and at a retail store, the store buys x amount of units at a fixed price, and with supply and demand the store will lower the price to move the unit so that is why I think its like comparing apples and oranges and unfair to GOG.
Post edited May 01, 2012 by Whitewraith
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Now I wish I hadn't voted for getting newer games on GOG on that survey that they gave us.
I'd rather not have newer games on GOG (or any game) if they're going exceed the $9.99 price for old games.
After all, I can simply buy them from Steam and typically for much cheaper.
I don't have a particularly huge issue with DRM either, but I was willing to support GOG on principle.
If GOG deviates from their principles then I guess I will also refrain from buying on principle.
I have been rather critical of Gog lately but I haven't written them off yet (not by a long shot.) Growing pains are no surprise and I think it's still pretty early for regrets.
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I have been rather critical of Gog lately but I haven't written them off yet (not by a long shot.) Growing pains are no surprise and I think it's still pretty early for regrets.
Look, typically if I want a game, I will buy it. Doesn't matter how draconian the DRM is, what the price is like, if the support is shit, etc. I shall have my PC gaming entertainment when I want it. Which is typically rare, since I am playing titles that I already own 90% of the time.

Despite that, I have respect for GOG as a solid DD because of the promises that they made. No DRM, simple and reasonable pricing, regular releasing of old games, frequent enough sales (taking into account the size of the catalogue) and extras (though I've never used a single extra). I like it how GOG is pioneering a customer-friendly approach despite pressure and denial from the rest of the industry. If these promises are broken, GOG will simply become another DD for me. I don't mind Steam - it's very comfortable for my lifestyle. The difference is that I was willing to support GOG because I had respect for them as a company as a result of how they treated their customers and how they were always championing consumer rights. I've never had any respect for Steam.

I just checked my shelf and I have 97 titles from GOG, including TW 1 + 2, the latter which I bought at release with no intention of playing it. Still haven't touched either TWs (they are at the back of my backlog). I've also gifted away 18 games. Minus the free games and what I've been gifted, I probably have ~100 games purchased from GOG. I've also bought duplicates on GOG of my favourite games that I already own on Steam.

I have 132 games on Steam, most of which have been bought for a couple of pounds.

I've been on GOG since 2010. I've been on Steam since 2003.
I put my money where my mouth is. I'd love to see GOG do the same.
low rated
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I have been rather critical of Gog lately but I haven't written them off yet (not by a long shot.) Growing pains are no surprise and I think it's still pretty early for regrets.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Look, typically if I want a game, I will buy it. Doesn't matter how draconian the DRM is, what the price is like, if the support is shit, etc. I shall have my PC gaming entertainment when I want it. Which is typically rare, since I am playing titles that I already own 90% of the time.

Despite that, I have respect for GOG as a solid DD because of the promises that they made. No DRM, simple and reasonable pricing, regular releasing of old games, frequent enough sales (taking into account the size of the catalogue) and extras (though I've never used a single extra). I like it how GOG is pioneering a customer-friendly approach despite pressure and denial from the rest of the industry. If these promises are broken, GOG will simply become another DD for me. I don't mind Steam - it's very comfortable for my lifestyle. The difference is that I was willing to support GOG because I had respect for them as a company as a result of how they treated their customers and how they were always championing consumer rights. I've never had any respect for Steam.

I just checked my shelf and I have 97 titles from GOG, including TW 1 + 2, the latter which I bought at release with no intention of playing it. Still haven't touched either TWs (they are at the back of my backlog). I've also gifted away 18 games. Minus the free games and what I've been gifted, I probably have ~100 games purchased from GOG. I've also bought duplicates on GOG of my favourite games that I already own on Steam.

I have 132 games on Steam, most of which have been bought for a couple of pounds.

I've been on GOG since 2010. I've been on Steam since 2003.
I put my money where my mouth is. I'd love to see GOG do the same.
I still don't like you much.
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I have been rather critical of Gog lately but I haven't written them off yet (not by a long shot.) Growing pains are no surprise and I think it's still pretty early for regrets.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Look, typically if I want a game, I will buy it. Doesn't matter how draconian the DRM is, what the price is like, if the support is shit, etc. I shall have my PC gaming entertainment when I want it. Which is typically rare, since I am playing titles that I already own 90% of the time.

Despite that, I have respect for GOG as a solid DD because of the promises that they made. No DRM, simple and reasonable pricing, regular releasing of old games, frequent enough sales (taking into account the size of the catalogue) and extras (though I've never used a single extra). I like it how GOG is pioneering a customer-friendly approach despite pressure and denial from the rest of the industry. If these promises are broken, GOG will simply become another DD for me. I don't mind Steam - it's very comfortable for my lifestyle. The difference is that I was willing to support GOG because I had respect for them as a company as a result of how they treated their customers and how they were always championing consumer rights. I've never had any respect for Steam.

I just checked my shelf and I have 97 titles from GOG, including TW 1 + 2, the latter which I bought at release with no intention of playing it. Still haven't touched either TWs (they are at the back of my backlog). I've also gifted away 18 games. Minus the free games and what I've been gifted, I probably have ~100 games purchased from GOG. I've also bought duplicates on GOG of my favourite games that I already own on Steam.

I have 132 games on Steam, most of which have been bought for a couple of pounds.

I've been on GOG since 2010. I've been on Steam since 2003.
I put my money where my mouth is. I'd love to see GOG do the same.
Amen, brother!
Hm let's see now:
Rollercoaster Tycoon 3 Platinum - 19.99$ (year 2006)
The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind® - 19.99$ (year 2002)
Quake IV - 19.99$ (year 2005)
Dungeon Siege III - 19.99$ (year 2011)

I don't see anyone having issues with this prices. Yes it is overpriced for sure,but yet GOG don't make the prices.

If you don't like the price - wait for a sale ...don't hate GOG on it ;)
avatar
ETOX: I still don't like you much.
and he said there's no love lost between you two , so obviously he doesn't give a shit, The conversation you're having is idiotic and pointless
Post edited May 02, 2012 by CaptainGyro
avatar
Whitewraith: To me its like arguing over delivered pizza and frozen pizza (digital and retail) if you want to have a discussion over the unfairness of digital vs retail there is merit there but to compare them when GOG announces a new release and saying its a rip off compared to some bargain bin retail store price is to me like comparing the price of a delivered pizza vs a frozen pizza. There both the same but different.
In a perfect world digital should be cheaper because of all the reasons you say but it is not how it is PC game makers created a system where digital is more money (usually) and at a retail store, the store buys x amount of units at a fixed price, and with supply and demand the store will lower the price to move the unit so that is why I think its like comparing apples and oranges and unfair to GOG.
I'm not sure how your analogy fits here, nor I do see what you're trying to argue. Frozen pizza is an inherently inferior product to freshly made pizza and is therefore cheaper.

There are two established points of view on this forum. Some, like me, would argue that you are buying a full product - game, disc, box and all (the boxed versions in new circulation only contain a PDF manual) - and from this perspective the argument would be that the boxed version is superior, yet it is cheaper than the alternative.

Others might say that all you're buying is the game and the disc is merely a means of transport to your computer, like a download. Not a POV I subscribe to, but OK. Humouring this for a second, that means you have the opportunity to buy the exact same product for half the price.

I'm not talking about bargain bin prices - the game is readily available as part of established budget game ranges such as Mastertronic in the UK and the Software Pyramide in Germany. This isn't bargain bin. I'm talking about the fact that you can get either a superior product or an identical for half the price under established sales conditions. This isn't a product that has been priced down to get rid of stock - these copies have been shipped to the retail stores with those reccommended retail prices. Software Pyramide titles in Germany always ship at 10 euros. Mastertronic games always ship at around the 7 pound price point.

It's like saying "why pay €2 for that fresh pizza when you can pay €5 for a frozen one"? And yes, in a perfect world, digital would be cheaper, and as you say, it's not, so why should I as a consumer buy digital when the superior product is cheaper?
Post edited May 02, 2012 by jamyskis
I really dont understand all that whinning and crying. This is business for GOG and this is money-oriented world outside. I possess appox 30-40 titles on GOG, titles that I would never see again if not GOG! Old classics like Magic Carpet, new titles like Machinarium, all brought in decent prices and made me happy to play them. I possess as well many new games, from Skyrim to DOW2 and Napoleon TW. I have to admit these are completely different branches of computer enterntainment - old games are about fun, new games are about following the trend - mostly. GOG is fair more than any other DD company in my knowledge, doing research, care about our opinion and most of all - they seams to be so pro to get more and more games into range. I am happy to have games on my disc, can install them on my demand, can store them, can read articles about and print dvd-covers to put them on shelf. So from me - if the price is high like in this particular situation, I go around and buy other title if need. No to start doing some hate or dissapointment discussion. None is forced to buy games from GOG, we are free people. But as far as for today, they are fair beyond standards and I admire this page and all fun I was able to discover and rediscover.
avatar
jamyskis: There are two established points of view on this forum. Some, like me, would argue that you are buying a full product - game, disc, box and all (the boxed versions in new circulation only contain a PDF manual) - and from this perspective the argument would be that the boxed version is superior, yet it is cheaper than the alternative.

Others might say that all you're buying is the game and the disc is merely a means of transport to your computer, like a download. Not a POV I subscribe to, but OK. Humouring this for a second, that means you have the opportunity to buy the exact same product for half the price.
To keep our long running retail vs. digital argument going (;-P):

The benefits or a digital distribution is not that your merely "get a game", but the service accompanied with it. With GOG, Steam, Origin and GG I have indefinite downloads everywhere I am, whenever I want. Especially Steam is very comfortable for me, as I can use it on my Laptop and Desktop without any hassle. And I can buy them at a whim and have them readily available.

That is also why I keep my digital releases on those services. Between those four, I have 95% of all PC games covered and always available.

That is also what I like least on my 3DS. Last week I felt the urge to play a JRPG again. Yet, I can only get them retail which would have taken at least a day (maybe even more) and as the weekend was coming up, I wasn't sure if the post would make it and I needed to be at home. What happened? I unpacked Chrono Trigger and gave it another go. If I could have bought FF IV or III digital, I would be playing that now.

I'll be moving in the next week, and I only have to carry one box of maybe 30 games (from back when I still bought retail, not 250+ games).

Therefore, digital distribution isn't merely "giving me a game", but it is offering me a service that retail can't provide.

Edit: I was trying to say that a proper digital service has more value to me than a box with a DVD.
Post edited May 02, 2012 by SimonG
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: ...
I've been on GOG since 2010. I've been on Steam since 2003.
I put my money where my mouth is. I'd love to see GOG do the same.
avatar
ETOX: I still don't like you much.
You have already made that clear in the first post...
If the intent here is make Frater get angry, I don't think it'll work.
Post edited May 02, 2012 by Drelmanes
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: snip
What was your opinion of Gog backpedaling on regional pricing of TW2? Do you hold Gog responsible for breaking a promise?

Why do you think Gog decided to price RT3 at $19.99? Or did they?

My hypothesis is they were unprepared for the sharks they now find themselves swimming with. I wouldn't be surprised if Gog honestly intended the new price points to apply only to new games while the publishers had different ideas.