Was this mentioned by GOG staff? I remember only their comment about SS. Anyway I wonder if appearance Syndicate announces new batch of EA games.

Yes I believe they commented on the issue about both SS series and Syndicate at the first EA press conference back in june, and it's been stated in several posts in this thread:

http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/gog_com_s_catalog_gets_huge_with_addition_of_classic_ea_titles/page1

but GOG never went much farther than "there are legal issues and we are working on them". Apparently they are indeed working hard at it :)

Yeah, but the worldwide marketing deals may have been different. There's multiple things that make these things pretty complicated. GOG only releases worldwide or not at all. If you have to pick between seriously time consuming legal issues for a base game or an expac, of course you pick the base game.

I do find it a bit odd people get so upset about the expac thing, I mean, the base games in a lot of these were already awesome and contained serious bang for your buck. Would an expac be nicer? Oh hell yeah! But it's certainly not required in most cases.

i find this a bit odd, TBH. surely not every single expansion to every EA game ever made was made by a different developer than the main game?

the Alien Crossfire expansion to Alpha Centauri was developed by Firaxis. a budget-priced DVD release containing both games is still being sold, at least in the UK.

to me it looks like GoG simply didn't bother to include the expansions in their distribution contract, which would probably have raised the licensing cost. i don't know. i just don't believe that the 'outside-developer' argument could possibly explain all the missing expansions.

i disagree completely. expansions were often more than just additional content. they often modified and improved the base game as well, adding gameplay features and technical improvements such as higher resolution support. in many cases, the expansions make the base game the edition it was always supposed to be, and it hurts the game to be released without those improvements 10 or 20 years later, especially if physical copies of complete editions are sill in circulation (such as the Alpha Centauri Gold or Complete Pack that can still be found in brand new condition on Ebay).

the practice hurts GoG.com because it makes the physical copy more attractive than the digital one.

The weird thing to me is that this missing expansions issue is so specific to EA. Sure, there are a handful of games from other publishers that lack expansion packs, but GOG has almost always managed to secure the rights to sell complete editions. Only in the case of EA this seems to be nearly impossible for some reason that I don't understand.

I would also guess that it was a f*ck up on GOGs part. They probably only had games in the original agreement and forgot about the exp, or thought they were included.

Especially bad with SMAX, Privateer and WC 1 + 2.

Wouldn't that be solved rather fast under normal circumstances, given that the base games are already being licensed?

you'd think it would be, but then again, licensing contracts can be incredibly tricky, and tedious to negotiate.

maybe EA wanted the expansions to be sold separately on GoG at $5.99 each, and GoG said 'no'?

EA wouldn't just ad them for free, and GOG probably won't gain as much as with the original games. They can't sell them extra and adding them and raising the price wouldn't go down well with the community.

Therefore, GOG can only lose money in the process. Most people, like me, have already bought the games, so they don't need an incentive to sell more.

Most certainly! But if one considers that EA already agreed to distribute several games this way, it would only seem logic that the expansion rights should be negotiated faster.

Several people already stated they'd purchase the expansion on GOG separately, so if that's the case, I'd expect a poll at least on GOG's side.

i picked up all the EA games i wanted during the sale when they were all 50% off, so i won't complain about the lack of expansions. not at that price.

however, i would be willing to pay full price, $9.99 if need be, for complete editions. just saying... there is incentive there...

sounds like a good idea. i'd probably vote yes because getting the expansions that way would be better than not getting them at all.

You and me both, but you know how bitchy gamers are today. If GOG would raise the prices to $9.99 there would be one shitstorm here. People even complain about sales only having 30% for $6 games ...

Yes because GOG.com has a long history of forgetting about games, not releasing bonus content, not adding bonus content when they can, and generally not caring about the releases once they go live. Guys seriously? ...

I'm sure that there's some legal mumbo jumbo in the way, GOG has always provided us with the best deal they could get and if they don't include the expansions, they probably have a good reason for that.

I think the main reason is who actually owns the expansion the developer or the actual publisher?

If it is the developer then gog has to track these guys down and after many many years developers could have disbanded etc which may make aquiring the approval and the materials needed near impossible.