Posted May 25, 2011
Demut
デムト
Demut Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Germany
nondeplumage
32 Bit World
nondeplumage Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
They were doing just fine in society for millennia. They cease to be properly integrated only when people force them out and ostracize them, which has become the problem now, because someone somewhere said they should and some people are easily led.
And to once more paraphrase Terry Pratchett, the inherent servility of humanity is depressing.
And to once more paraphrase Terry Pratchett, the inherent servility of humanity is depressing.
GamezRanker
Disagreement Verboten!
GamezRanker Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
Demut
デムト
Demut Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Posted May 25, 2011
What? Where did that come from? I was talking about why incestuous marriages should then be legal as well since they are as harmless as homosexual marriages.
GamezRanker
Disagreement Verboten!
GamezRanker Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
GameRager: No what you're saying basically is that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry if they get some tax breaks that "normal" married couple do, and not because you're being bigoted in any way shape or form.
Demut: What? Where did that come from? I was talking about why incestuous marriages should then be legal as well since they are as harmless as homosexual marriages. Demut
デムト
Demut Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Khalaq
I smell a Wumpus
Khalaq Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2008
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
nondeplumage: Well, Germany's good at undermining large populations of people. Good to know they haven't changed much.
And I'm taking history, you people who automatically think about reaching for the Nazi card.
Are you, really? Because your comment makes it sound as if you haven't studied enough, yet. That wouldn't be surprising, given the sad state of the modern educational system. If you really want to understand history, you need to read the books that nobody every hears about because they've been hidden away in dusty libraries. If you read only what is assigned in approved curricula, you'll never get past the "mushroom" stage. And I'm taking history, you people who automatically think about reaching for the Nazi card.
More useful than understanding the German people and how the two World Wars were planned and set into motion, however, is to understand how Hitler came to be leader of Germany without ever truly gaining control of the country.
-Khalaq
Post edited May 25, 2011 by Khalaq
nondeplumage
32 Bit World
nondeplumage Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
Khalaq: Are you, really? Because your comment makes it sound as if you haven't studied enough, yet. That wouldn't be surprising, given the sad state of the modern educational system. If you really want to understand history, you need to read the books that nobody every hears about because they've been hidden away in dusty libraries. If you read only what is assigned in approved curricula, you'll never get past the "mushroom" stage.
Yes, really. History is my bag, man. And if you're into the past events of...stuff happening, and don't know about this site:
http://badassoftheweek.com/
then you're welcome.
Tulivu
Surndr & Die
Tulivu Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
nondeplumage: They were doing just fine in society for millennia. They cease to be properly integrated only when people force them out and ostracize them, which has become the problem now, because someone somewhere said they should and some people are easily led.
And to once more paraphrase Terry Pratchett, the inherent servility of humanity is depressing.
I remember people trying to argue that the unsafe sex practices of the gay community were reason to oppose it. By ostricizing them, society was encouraging said practice and spread of STI's (not that this was happening the way people portrayed). Incest doesn't work as well.And to once more paraphrase Terry Pratchett, the inherent servility of humanity is depressing.
Demut
デムト
Demut Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Posted May 25, 2011
nondeplumage: And if you're into the past events of...stuff happening, and don't know about this site:
http://badassoftheweek.com/
then you're welcome.
Oh, great, glorifying soldiers. As if that hasn’t happened often enough.http://badassoftheweek.com/
then you're welcome.
orcishgamer
Mad and Green
orcishgamer Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
Post edited May 25, 2011 by orcishgamer
jeffreydean1
Lord of Awesome
jeffreydean1 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From Canada
Posted May 25, 2011
GameRager: 1. Just because someone's religious leaders don't/won't admit part or a good chunk of it's religious ideas could be wrong doesn't mean all those who follow that faith also do so. I'm religious and even I don't believe everything i';m told. I admit some of it could be very wrong...
2. And what religion does this today and kills/imprisons people of opposing beliefs? Outside the more visible extremist sects and offshoots that is.
I know mine doesn't, and I don't.
----------------------------------
As for scientists, it's more the fact that many of the more extreme atheists don't find it hypocritical to follow a theory(like big bang) with only shreds of "evidence" that only a few eggheads can understand fully?
Not syaing Big Bang is wrong, but to tout it as almost 100% fact as some hard;ine atheists do is borderline blind faith on their part, just like some extremist faith followers follow blindly something they can't prove themsleves or understand little about yet follow anyways.
I have never in my life heard an atheist that believed with such faith and fervor in the big bang as religious people like to pretend that they do. Most accept it as what it is and what it always has been presented as: a possible theory. 2. And what religion does this today and kills/imprisons people of opposing beliefs? Outside the more visible extremist sects and offshoots that is.
I know mine doesn't, and I don't.
----------------------------------
As for scientists, it's more the fact that many of the more extreme atheists don't find it hypocritical to follow a theory(like big bang) with only shreds of "evidence" that only a few eggheads can understand fully?
Not syaing Big Bang is wrong, but to tout it as almost 100% fact as some hard;ine atheists do is borderline blind faith on their part, just like some extremist faith followers follow blindly something they can't prove themsleves or understand little about yet follow anyways.
Personally, I don't know. That's why I am an agnostic. I find anyone who claims to know something without the slightest hint of evidence illogical. That INCLUDES atheists. While the onus is NOT on them to prove that God does not exist (you cannot generally prove a negative) it takes a certain degree of faith to claim with any kind of certainty that there is in fact no god.
Religious folks hate to acknowledge the existence of agnostics because we take away their easy target of atheism.
As for the side argument about gay marriage, agree with those saying that the government needs to get out of marriage altogether. But as long as government gives special rights to heterosexual couples, not extending those rights to gay couples is discrimination.
GamezRanker
Disagreement Verboten!
GamezRanker Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
jeffreydean1: I have never in my life heard an atheist that believed with such faith and fervor in the big bang as religious people like to pretend that they do. Most accept it as what it is and what it always has been presented as: a possible theory.
Personally, I don't know. That's why I am an agnostic. I find anyone who claims to know something without the slightest hint of evidence illogical. That INCLUDES atheists. While the onus is NOT on them to prove that God does not exist (you cannot generally prove a negative) it takes a certain degree of faith to claim with any kind of certainty that there is in fact no god.
Religious folks hate to acknowledge the existence of agnostics because we take away their easy target of atheism.
As for the side argument about gay marriage, agree with those saying that the government needs to get out of marriage altogether. But as long as government gives special rights to heterosexual couples, not extending those rights to gay couples is discrimination.
Nonsense....there are many atheists that uphold the theory of the big bang with such blind loyalty, especially while stating that blind loyalty in a faith is dumb/etc, that it sickens me sometimes. Personally, I don't know. That's why I am an agnostic. I find anyone who claims to know something without the slightest hint of evidence illogical. That INCLUDES atheists. While the onus is NOT on them to prove that God does not exist (you cannot generally prove a negative) it takes a certain degree of faith to claim with any kind of certainty that there is in fact no god.
Religious folks hate to acknowledge the existence of agnostics because we take away their easy target of atheism.
As for the side argument about gay marriage, agree with those saying that the government needs to get out of marriage altogether. But as long as government gives special rights to heterosexual couples, not extending those rights to gay couples is discrimination.
Agreed on part 2....people who believe something on either side with such certainty are illogical...and annyoing as religious evangelicals to boot.
I acknowledge agnosticism.
And I also agree on the gay marriage thing.
Post edited May 25, 2011 by GameRager
Tulivu
Surndr & Die
Tulivu Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2010
From United States
Posted May 25, 2011
jeffreydean1: I have never in my life heard an atheist that believed with such faith and fervor in the big bang as religious people like to pretend that they do. Most accept it as what it is and what it always has been presented as: a possible theory.
Personally, I don't know. That's why I am an agnostic. I find anyone who claims to know something without the slightest hint of evidence illogical. That INCLUDES atheists. While the onus is NOT on them to prove that God does not exist (you cannot generally prove a negative) it takes a certain degree of faith to claim with any kind of certainty that there is in fact no god.
Religious folks hate to acknowledge the existence of agnostics because we take away their easy target of atheism.
As for the side argument about gay marriage, agree with those saying that the government needs to get out of marriage altogether. But as long as government gives special rights to heterosexual couples, not extending those rights to gay couples is discrimination.
GameRager: Nonsense....there are many atheists that uphold the theory of the big bang with such blind loyalty, especially while stating that blind loyalty in a faith is dumb/etc, that it sickens me sometimes. Personally, I don't know. That's why I am an agnostic. I find anyone who claims to know something without the slightest hint of evidence illogical. That INCLUDES atheists. While the onus is NOT on them to prove that God does not exist (you cannot generally prove a negative) it takes a certain degree of faith to claim with any kind of certainty that there is in fact no god.
Religious folks hate to acknowledge the existence of agnostics because we take away their easy target of atheism.
As for the side argument about gay marriage, agree with those saying that the government needs to get out of marriage altogether. But as long as government gives special rights to heterosexual couples, not extending those rights to gay couples is discrimination.
Agreed on part 2....people who believe something on either side with such certainty are illogical...and annyoing as religious evangelicals to boot.
I acknowledge agnosticism.
And I also agree on the gay marriage thing.
Sorry, GR. ;-)
Demut
デムト
Demut Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Posted May 25, 2011
orcishgamer: My take is that's merely a red herring. Just like someone marrying their dog, or whatever other silly stuff people have come up with to avoid facing their prejudices.
Then have another take. Should incestous marriage be legalized? And please explain why or why not. I am sensing bias on your part here. @jeffreydean1: Skepticism for the win!