Posted February 26, 2009
History and criticism ended at PC Gamer this past month. I got my copy in the mail today, and they have cut all the opinion columns. Desslock, Bruce Todd, Andy Mahood, all of them. Just like my local newspaper reducing the Sunday comics to two eye-strain inducing pages, Future seems to have responded to financial pressures by cutting something it did well. They've gotten rid of the part that brought some perspective to gaming and kept the reviews and the hype. I feel badly for the guys who've lost the income after they've given me such good food for thought for years now.
And if the magazine's EIC used the word "commission" correctly in his intro, the magazine still had the money for the sleaziest, most disturbing cover they've had yet. Wasn't she a small child in the first game? I don't care if they explain inside somewhere; a cover like this without prior context is just creepy.
Edit: "with" in the last line was supposed to be "without"
And if the magazine's EIC used the word "commission" correctly in his intro, the magazine still had the money for the sleaziest, most disturbing cover they've had yet. Wasn't she a small child in the first game? I don't care if they explain inside somewhere; a cover like this without prior context is just creepy.
Edit: "with" in the last line was supposed to be "without"
Post edited February 26, 2009 by Syme