Posted April 09, 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1743/a17434f66a493b4b0258e46923c8892afdf54393" alt="avatar"
If AoW3 has a good single player experience then it feels less fishy, but If the point of the game is very MP heavy, then it's tempting to feel like there is some PR magic at work to hook people into getting something without them really understanding what they are getting into.
Any Devil's advocacy aside, the idea of needing an account to save your settings is hard to justify. I suppose if the settings in question were all account and MP related then whatever, but if we are talking about controls and graphics settings then that would seem like a deliberate act of douchebaggery that I have no interest in defending.
Yes or No on the DRM conclusion it sure looks like they are walking the fence line as close as possible. For anyone trying to go DRM-free I would prefer them just to commit to it, and not try to get creative about trying to find a way to check the DRM-free box without having to give up the control. We shouldn't have to have long philosophical discussions about if a game is or is not DRM-free. If it takes walls of text to try and convince half of the GOG consumer base that a game meets GOG's standards, then maybe something is a little off.
When you have a single player game, that won't let you do what every other single player game in the history of gaming does (save your resolutions, keyboard mapping, sound settings, AA settings, etc) because you aren't logged into an account, IT IS DRM.
I would challenge anyone to name any other single player game that requires one to be "logged in" as guest to save a game or change all of their specific settings before each gameplay. And if anyone can name such a game, then it's a game with DRM.