Posted April 09, 2014
gooberking: It's an interesting situation. I tried reading what was going on in the game's forum, but without trying it I'm not sure I know enough. There are games that have MP requirements here. Two Worlds comes up a lot, but as someone who has put probably a hundred hours or more into that game, I can say that there is a sizable amount of single player content to play outside of any MP situation.
If AoW3 has a good single player experience then it feels less fishy, but If the point of the game is very MP heavy, then it's tempting to feel like there is some PR magic at work to hook people into getting something without them really understanding what they are getting into.
Any Devil's advocacy aside, the idea of needing an account to save your settings is hard to justify. I suppose if the settings in question were all account and MP related then whatever, but if we are talking about controls and graphics settings then that would seem like a deliberate act of douchebaggery that I have no interest in defending.
Yes or No on the DRM conclusion it sure looks like they are walking the fence line as close as possible. For anyone trying to go DRM-free I would prefer them just to commit to it, and not try to get creative about trying to find a way to check the DRM-free box without having to give up the control. We shouldn't have to have long philosophical discussions about if a game is or is not DRM-free. If it takes walls of text to try and convince half of the GOG consumer base that a game meets GOG's standards, then maybe something is a little off.
Exactly. All those walls of text are just attempts at defending gog. It happens all the time, it happened when the did away with regional pricing. There were walls of text defending that too. that's what many consumers do today, defend whatever some company does, just because they're a fan. If AoW3 has a good single player experience then it feels less fishy, but If the point of the game is very MP heavy, then it's tempting to feel like there is some PR magic at work to hook people into getting something without them really understanding what they are getting into.
Any Devil's advocacy aside, the idea of needing an account to save your settings is hard to justify. I suppose if the settings in question were all account and MP related then whatever, but if we are talking about controls and graphics settings then that would seem like a deliberate act of douchebaggery that I have no interest in defending.
Yes or No on the DRM conclusion it sure looks like they are walking the fence line as close as possible. For anyone trying to go DRM-free I would prefer them just to commit to it, and not try to get creative about trying to find a way to check the DRM-free box without having to give up the control. We shouldn't have to have long philosophical discussions about if a game is or is not DRM-free. If it takes walls of text to try and convince half of the GOG consumer base that a game meets GOG's standards, then maybe something is a little off.
When you have a single player game, that won't let you do what every other single player game in the history of gaming does (save your resolutions, keyboard mapping, sound settings, AA settings, etc) because you aren't logged into an account, IT IS DRM.
I would challenge anyone to name any other single player game that requires one to be "logged in" as guest to save a game or change all of their specific settings before each gameplay. And if anyone can name such a game, then it's a game with DRM.