Let me quote what you said: "i dont want to remark too much the DRM-free policy, because, as i already said at the beginning of this thread, i consider it right with regard to any kind of online check system, but undue about any kind of offline check system (ie passwords). "

So, you're fine with DRM (online verification the very definition of DRM), unless you've made a grammar error that gives that quote the opposite meaning that you intended. You hate CD keys (which are not technically DRM, i.e. no third party is managing your ability to use the software, if you have a valid CD key and a copy of the software it will always work). Don't try and spin that as you saying "I hate DRM". You just said you were fine with it.

Yes, I can say "a lot of us" because I've spoken over time to many members of this community and they've expressed the sentiment I'm relating. I did not say "all of us" or "we" as you seem to prefer. I made no statement as to the whole of the GOG userbase, I simply gave you a counter example to your statement which included all GOG users (because you used "we") and said, no, here's some counter examples. You're statements about all community members not liking new games, not being willing to pay for new games, and that we didn't care about GOG's "no-DRM" stance, were all fundamentally bullshit. I only need one counter example to prove it, but since I know what others have related to me I can say there's a lot more than me.

Oh boo hoo, I can pay 60 USD for a game and not euros. Well, you bitched about $30-40. I don't know what the fuck dollar you were referring to, but 60 USD is more than 30-40 of any dollar currency on the world market.

You seriously can't find any new releases that are good out of the box? I guess that's not surprising since you claim to hate new games, but I have a XBox Live library full of games and shelf of XBox 360 games that work just fine and have no patches, old XBox 360 games often only have a patch to add Kinect integration and that's it. There were plenty of older games that were unplayable on launch, holy crap, some formatted your hard drive due to bugs, some games couldn't be won, some games took 5 minutes to load a saved game... you know what's funny about a lot of those? Some of them are on GOG. But just because some old games launched as bug-ridden messes doesn't mean they all did, and the same holds true today.

Look, I don't really care what you do and don't like. The only reason anyone's debating you at all is you keep misrepresenting your views for all user's views when in reality there's a wide-variety of viewpoints here. Quit saying "we" and start saying "I" and then everyone will be happy to let you say whatever the hell you want. As long as you keep saying "we" or "all GOG users" and the like, we're going to keep pointing out that you're arguments are bullshit when applied to the whole community, and probably bullshit when you apply it to most.

What you think the last survey GOG did that specifically asked about this came back "90% of GOG users really hate the idea of GOG carrying new games at all" and GOG immediately said "Yep, 90% of our users hate it, let's do that!"?
The Witcher 2 isn't that price point either. As someone else said, they were thinking of new price points. I don't think you'll get Arkham City for 9.99 in the first year after release (though I'd expect it'd eventually end up at that price).

GOG has dropped the price of several of their catalog items in the past, even popular items. I suspect they'll be working out a contract for price decreases over time on all newer titles as they add them.