Posted November 18, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09142/0914216e8cc018639096aaf234782b9306834877" alt="klaymen"
klaymen
Just as planned!
Registered: Sep 2008
From Slovakia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0897b/0897b3bd224e989de28e10c8ff635f469ddcb0cb" alt="KneeTheCap"
KneeTheCap
Nasse-Setä
Registered: Feb 2010
From Finland
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/146dc/146dce5c35ad1f35ad61e4a5e344d1b7e038e328" alt="Stuff"
Stuff
Resident Old Man
Registered: Dec 2008
From United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483c6/483c69e55806e01577de7f0e139365fa78edd2aa" alt="Aningan"
Aningan
YNWA
Registered: Dec 2010
From Western Sahara
Posted November 18, 2011
Actually the OP is in the minority on this one. According to the survey the majority of users who filled it in are for this change, rather than against.
Personally I said I'm all for new games, especially indie titles, DRM free and fair pricing, no 1$ = 1€ crap. Even the price point I put in the survey was 20$ (As in "Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game." :P ). And I think the new price points will be 13.99 and 16.99 if I'm not mistaken.
So what GOG announced fits my answers perfectly.
Personally I said I'm all for new games, especially indie titles, DRM free and fair pricing, no 1$ = 1€ crap. Even the price point I put in the survey was 20$ (As in "Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game." :P ). And I think the new price points will be 13.99 and 16.99 if I'm not mistaken.
So what GOG announced fits my answers perfectly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d771c/d771c16487b870e8b2342d67918258be0976b90c" alt=""
GOG-Marketing
GOG.com Team
Registered: Mar 2011
From Poland
Posted November 18, 2011
I'm happy to announce, that we will be releasing a news post addressing all of our users concerns ;)
ETA 15 minutes...
ETA 15 minutes...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0af2f/0af2fcc1c884414dd9409fbec6dbf62364cc1621" alt="rampancy"
rampancy
Think Different.
Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted November 18, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ac78/5ac78e968a8e937e7a1d34b5c167427388576853" alt="avatar"
Personally, if GOG releases newer games, under the same general terms as its current classic releases, why shouldn't be people be happy over that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52677/52677baee233e56c4cd70cadd645b3ee83d4c050" alt="SimonG"
SimonG
SimonG597
Registered: Sep 2010
From Germany
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0eed/c0eed1dd70f8452d78a159c10d0269a8f66a4d76" alt="Adzeth"
Adzeth
EagleOnPogoStick
Registered: Apr 2010
From Finland
Posted November 18, 2011
..but what if the new price point is... ONE MILLION DOLLARS!?
Yeah, everything's going downhill from now on, baby.
Yeah, everything's going downhill from now on, baby.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483c6/483c69e55806e01577de7f0e139365fa78edd2aa" alt="Aningan"
Aningan
YNWA
Registered: Dec 2010
From Western Sahara
Posted November 18, 2011
Hmmm, I looked for it and I can't find it. I probably misspoken. But it kinda makes sense, I mean it's most likely the reason for the announcement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f80a/8f80a88845093970fb254b86bc7878d13f354c75" alt="TheEnigmaticT"
TheEnigmaticT
GOG Marketer Guy
GOG.com Team
Registered: Nov 2010
From Poland
Posted November 18, 2011
I believe I mentioned that users are in favor of the newer games on GOG in bluetext somewhere on these forums. We haven't released the actual numbers from the poll yet, though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d82bf/d82bf17eacf5f842ba4d9fb70f391acd458f4d40" alt="Barefoot_Monkey"
Barefoot_Monkey
invertEd
Registered: Sep 2008
From South Africa
Posted November 18, 2011
I'm definitely in favour of new games.
About the price point - personally I think it would be good to have a window period of maybe 6-12 months (starting from the original release of the game) where there are no price points and the publisher decides an arbitrary price.
About the price point - personally I think it would be good to have a window period of maybe 6-12 months (starting from the original release of the game) where there are no price points and the publisher decides an arbitrary price.
Post edited November 18, 2011 by Barefoot_Monkey
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef204/ef204ab564a1d97009dbe17aea286e1fb18c9a5d" alt="StingingVelvet"
StingingVelvet
Devil's Advocate
Registered: Nov 2008
From United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35385/353850caf7f0ebe6b9d9426ac5fd41fe6ae71767" alt="jungletoad"
jungletoad
In GOG we trust
Registered: Sep 2009
From United States
Posted November 18, 2011
I wish GOG would just create a linked sister site called Good New Games (GNG).
I want to be able to buy DRM-Free new games, but we have something special here. I love that every time an old game like "Zork" gets released, there is a bunch of fanfare. It's like a constant celebration of PC gaming history to take part in the excitement of re-releases and to hear people reminisce about their favorite games of old. If GOG is going to sell new games and to attempt to go head-to-head with Steam, then that culture will change.
To stay competitive, GOG will have to post banners on the main page about new games. New games will become the primary subject matter of the forums. The advertisements will include new titles. New people will join the forums, including people that are graphics whores who will obnoxiously wonder out loud why gog even bothers to release old games with such crappy graphics. The cutlure will shift. GOG will not be able to remain a dedicated retro PC gaming community because GOG will not be completely dedicated to retro.
A sister site would solve this problem. GOG could remain how it is, and GNG could look shiny and new and have a design and marketing system that appeals to current generation gamers. Both games could end up on the same shelf, and the service could stay combined. This would just make the catalogues, forums, and marketing stay separated. And after 5 years, games from GNG could migrate over to GOG where we will celebrate their admission into the hallowed halls of PC classics.
GOG is a great service. DRM Free is a beautiful ideal that they have realized. I would like to see the DRM Free model applied to new games. We just need to remember, that this is also about old games and that a strong community has developed around this service that celebrates old games and features them on its main page exclusively. We have something special and, while new games would be welcomed, it shouldn't happen at the expense of the wonderful slice of gaming culture that already exists here.
I want to be able to buy DRM-Free new games, but we have something special here. I love that every time an old game like "Zork" gets released, there is a bunch of fanfare. It's like a constant celebration of PC gaming history to take part in the excitement of re-releases and to hear people reminisce about their favorite games of old. If GOG is going to sell new games and to attempt to go head-to-head with Steam, then that culture will change.
To stay competitive, GOG will have to post banners on the main page about new games. New games will become the primary subject matter of the forums. The advertisements will include new titles. New people will join the forums, including people that are graphics whores who will obnoxiously wonder out loud why gog even bothers to release old games with such crappy graphics. The cutlure will shift. GOG will not be able to remain a dedicated retro PC gaming community because GOG will not be completely dedicated to retro.
A sister site would solve this problem. GOG could remain how it is, and GNG could look shiny and new and have a design and marketing system that appeals to current generation gamers. Both games could end up on the same shelf, and the service could stay combined. This would just make the catalogues, forums, and marketing stay separated. And after 5 years, games from GNG could migrate over to GOG where we will celebrate their admission into the hallowed halls of PC classics.
GOG is a great service. DRM Free is a beautiful ideal that they have realized. I would like to see the DRM Free model applied to new games. We just need to remember, that this is also about old games and that a strong community has developed around this service that celebrates old games and features them on its main page exclusively. We have something special and, while new games would be welcomed, it shouldn't happen at the expense of the wonderful slice of gaming culture that already exists here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09db2/09db28ee4167732d675ab8fe90334abbfa0a1559" alt="meudoland"
meudoland
New User
Registered: May 2010
From Italy
Posted November 18, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a065a/a065ab9079a29278e16b8cc43a684a096fb7e959" alt="avatar"
I want to be able to buy DRM-Free new games, but we have something special here. I love that every time an old game like "Zork" gets released, there is a bunch of fanfare. It's like a constant celebration of PC gaming history to take part in the excitement of re-releases and to hear people reminisce about their favorite games of old. If GOG is going to sell new games and to attempt to go head-to-head with Steam, then that culture will change.
To stay competitive, GOG will have to post banners on the main page about new games. New games will become the primary subject matter of the forums. The advertisements will include new titles. New people will join the forums, including people that are graphics whores who will obnoxiously wonder out loud why gog even bothers to release old games with such crappy graphics. The cutlure will shift. GOG will not be able to remain a dedicated retro PC gaming community because GOG will not be completely dedicated to retro.
A sister site would solve this problem. GOG could remain how it is, and GNG could look shiny and new and have a design and marketing system that appeals to current generation gamers. Both games could end up on the same shelf, and the service could stay combined. This would just make the catalogues, forums, and marketing stay separated. And after 5 years, games from GNG could migrate over to GOG where we will celebrate their admission into the hallowed halls of PC classics.
GOG is a great service. DRM Free is a beautiful ideal that they have realized. I would like to see the DRM Free model applied to new games. We just need to remember, that this is also about old games and that a strong community has developed around this service that celebrates old games and features them on its main page exclusively. We have something special and, while new games would be welcomed, it shouldn't happen at the expense of the wonderful slice of gaming culture that already exists here.
Post edited November 18, 2011 by meudoland
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef204/ef204ab564a1d97009dbe17aea286e1fb18c9a5d" alt="StingingVelvet"
StingingVelvet
Devil's Advocate
Registered: Nov 2008
From United States