It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Weclock: maybe it's GOG's fault, but really none of you have passed me yet? I answered like 2 questions in the past month.
avatar
lowyhong: Weclock's rep: 333
You should stop now while you're still the all holy one
Note, for anyone who doesn't know, 3 is speculated by some as the opposite of the number 6

It is also said to be one half of infinity, as completed by five~
avatar
Vagabond: Remove rep. Now.

+1
In all seriousness I totally agree. It just gives incentive to spammers.
Or change it so rep is only given for solving problems and nothing else.
avatar
Ois: And Ois hangs on at 4th place! :D
I've not faded into obscurity just yet...

Only because I was out of commission for a couple of weeks. I'll catch up next month! :P
avatar
Vagabond: Remove rep. Now.
avatar
lotr-sam0711: +1
In all seriousness I totally agree. It just gives incentive to spammers.
Or change it so rep is only given for solving problems and nothing else.

If spamming gave you rep, that would be true, but since it doesn't, it isn't. You only get 1 rep point for each day you post in the forums, so at best it would really only encourage one spam message a day. The majority of rep actually comes from answering questions and getting high-ranked posts.
Post edited June 15, 2009 by cogadh
I love the Rep System, I think it works well, discourages spamming, encourages genuinely hilarious posts/topics and shows whose who in the experience stakes.
Post counters, now they're pointless; along with Signatures eight foot high with twelve lines of text and six animated Gifs.
Give me Avatars and Rep ANY day over the horrors of usual PHP forums.
avatar
Vagabond: Remove rep. Now.
avatar
lotr-sam0711: +1
In all seriousness I totally agree. It just gives incentive to spammers.
Or change it so rep is only given for solving problems and nothing else.
how does it encourage spamming? you can only get 1 rep per day by posting. :/
avatar
lotr-sam0711: +1
In all seriousness I totally agree. It just gives incentive to spammers.
Or change it so rep is only given for solving problems and nothing else.
avatar
Weclock: how does it encourage spamming? you can only get 1 rep per day by posting. :/
That's 1 rep too much.
avatar
Weclock: how does it encourage spamming? you can only get 1 rep per day by posting. :/
avatar
lotr-sam0711: That's 1 rep too much.
have you seen threads dedicated to spam? yes you have, and what happened? those people who were spamming were down repped.
the system is fine, the only thing that's broken is the rep update page.
avatar
stonebro: Rep whore.

We get rep?
Can I ask why this thread was created in the first place? Is the fact the list got updated (and in plain sight for anyone who wants to look) of vital importance? Seriously.
Karl
avatar
nimagraven: Rep does encourage people to spam, but then again, if you're actually talking about useful stuff.. Is it really spam?
Philosophical time.

+1 rep for mentioning "philosophical time" :-).
My take on this is that spamming (if we take it as making an unnecessary number of posts) goes inherently against "talking about useful stuff". If someone makes many posts, but they all (or at least their majority) have insigthful content, it's not spamming.
However, someone may spam the boards with an overflowing number of posts of varying content in the hopes that some of them will be deemed insigthful and thus be high-rated by other members.
@Karlallen
No need to be so... educative (sorry, I couldn't find a better word). I think every thread that has meaningful content has a right to exist. This thread was created by michaelleung in order to thank the GOG staff for updating the list in an ironic way (because they only did it after 3 months, although the second lists says "monthly").
avatar
nimagraven: Rep does encourage people to spam, but then again, if you're actually talking about useful stuff.. Is it really spam?
Philosophical time.

No, because spam is when you bombard places with useless shit you don't care about/V!agr@ and C!@l1s, whereas useful stuff that we might find interesting is obviously not. Sure, too much is information overload, but so?
avatar
nimagraven: Rep does encourage people to spam, but then again, if you're actually talking about useful stuff.. Is it really spam?
Philosophical time.
avatar
michaelleung: No, because spam is when you bombard places with useless shit you don't care about/V!agr@ and C!@l1s, whereas useful stuff that we might find interesting is obviously not. Sure, too much is information overload, but so?

For some those spam messages are meaningful and not useless. Therefore leading to the neverending circle of spammage.
How much wood could a wood chuck chuck ...
avatar
michaelleung: No, because spam is when you bombard places with useless shit you don't care about/V!agr@ and C!@l1s, whereas useful stuff that we might find interesting is obviously not. Sure, too much is information overload, but so?
avatar
nimagraven: How much wood could a wood chuck chuck ...

Wolfram Alpha that shit.
avatar
nimagraven: How much wood could a wood chuck chuck ...
avatar
michaelleung: Wolfram Alpha that shit.

You know, that was one of the first things I did with WolframAlpha.
avatar
DrIstvaan: @Karlallen
No need to be so... educative (sorry, I couldn't find a better word). I think every thread that has meaningful content has a right to exist. This thread was created by michaelleung in order to thank the GOG staff for updating the list in an ironic way (because they only did it after 3 months, although the second lists says "monthly").

Hmm... I did certainly have a bit of a high-horse there somewhat. My bad.
Karl