It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
doomer: what I need to do to play this game on wii? (i dont have a wii =)
I need a Wii (of course), an gamecube controller and purchase the disc + memory card?
Or it's avaliable on virtual console, and I just need a classic controller for wii?
tyvm

On virtual console. You need a classic Gc controller
avatar
doomer: what I need to do to play this game on wii? (i dont have a wii =)
I need a Wii (of course), an gamecube controller and purchase the disc + memory card?
Or it's avaliable on virtual console, and I just need a classic controller for wii?
tyvm
avatar
apoc17: On virtual console. You need a classic Gc controller
tyvm! i'm thinking about to purchase a Wii XD
(my girlfriend will kill me =)
OoT was fun when I used to play it on the n64. Although, just like everyone else that played it. I have nothing but obscenities for that Water Temple.
avatar
KEgstedt: I have fond memories of A Link to the Past and enjoyed Wind Waker. The rest of the Zelda games, not so much.
Never played Ocarina (didn't have an N64) and nowadays I can't get past the dated graphice since the gameplay is more or less the same as in later 3D Zelda games. Majora's Mask sounds like a brave and impressive but pathologically unentertaining departure from Zelda conventions. Link's Awakening and the other Gameboy titles felt like depressingly restricted budget versions of ALTTP, and I just kept getting stuck in Minish Cap (it always seemed terribly unclear where to go and what to do next). Haven't tried Twilight Princess but Gamespot's controversial review gave the impression that the formula had stagnated to the point where it simply wasn't interesting to me. Phantom Hourglass looks nice enough but if it is to Wind Waker what Link's Awakening was to ALTTP I still don't care.....

I found Link's Awakening superior to LttP. LttP IMO was more restrictive, as there was more clutter in its design. LA has barely any wasted space in the game world, and a superior item set, particularly the Roc's Feather.
for the people that Played it what did they think of Master Quest Version of OoT
Post edited October 30, 2009 by Master911
A Link to the Past is my favorite Zelda game also. And Ocarina was pretty awesome , but I'm going to call it a douchebag anyway. I bought that game, got to the water temple, got stuck, saved my game and quit. The next day my games files were mysteriously gone and I quit playing because I didn't want to redo everything. Then I lent my 64 to my brother and about a year later he started his own game and my game saves had magically reappeared on the cart for no reason. What a douchebag!
avatar
azul120: I found Link's Awakening superior to LttP. LttP IMO was more restrictive, as there was more clutter in its design. LA has barely any wasted space in the game world, and a superior item set, particularly the Roc's Feather.

I should have been more specific about what I meant by "restricted", which in my case referred to more superficial things like graphics, music etc. The overall structure of the game may very well have been better, but I just couldn't get past the loss of LttP's vibrant colors and epic sound quality.
That said, I can't recall getting stuck in LttP whereas I did get stuck in LA (and thus never finished it). So unless I'm getting more stupid for each year (which admittedly is not entirely outside the realm of possibility ;) I'd still say that LttP had the best and most clearly thought out design...
Post edited October 30, 2009 by KEgstedt