michaelleung: Wired's got a
great article on internet/gaming addiction and those rehab centers in China you keep hearing about, specifically a case about a boy who went there (who wasn't even playing that much), and died 14 hours later. He was hit so hard by a wooden chair, the chair leg broke. Read it, it's very interesting and raises the questions on how these "addictions" should be "treated", and whether or not we should call these addictions or rather a monumental waste of time on a computer.
FUCK I typed obsessed wrong in the title.
A misconception of addiction is that addiction is spending a lot of time on stuff. It isn't!
Addiction is when you have psychological problems with being away from the thing you are addicted to. I spend almost my whole time on internet but I don't think I'm addicted because it's ok for me, if there's something interesting, to go out into town or so or do some travel for it.
On the other hand, people who spend only 1 or two hours per week on internet but have real problems when that is taken away are addicted.
I would say I'm addicted to love and chess (in that order) because I really have problems if I don't get one of these. However, I only need to care about love since for chess - well, a good brain is enough for that! Love, on the other hand, is something powerful but also fragile - and at the same time unbreakable -, and I don't think I'm wrong that most people who think they feel love never have felt it at all, or only parts of it.
Back to topic, however, people can get addicted to almost everything, but not everything is marked as being ill. Yes, I'm addicted to oxyd - everyone is - but it's normal! Addiction to cigarettes is not normal because it is not important for survival. Etc.