jefequeso: Or, put that money toward improvements/studies related to mental health and how to better treat it and identify possible dangerous cases.
I'll never claim to be an expert on politics or social issues, but to me this reeks of political posing. Trying to look like something is being done rather than actually tackling the issue from a useful angle.
Indeed. One of the major criticisms of the mental health gun bill in New York is that it will discourage people from seeking treatment out of fear of a state-mandated intervention. It's only compounding the stigma of mental illness, which hurts that entire field and the country as well. But tackling the mental health system is HARD, and it's a lot easier to tackle easier, more direct issues rather than the root cause. Making a lot of attacks on the periphery is short-sighted and I believe doomed to failure.
(Interestingly enough, the most common violent media connecting mass killers is actually violent LITERATURE. So like, we should totally burn violent books or something, wouldn't that be cool?)
doady: Doing studies is a good thing, right? A politician wanting more information, instead making policies and laws based on emotions, I don't see how this is bad. As noted, the result of study could easily (and likely) be that violence is not the result of video games and put the matter to rest.
There's already been many, many studies done on this subject. (See my first post.) The only reason more studies are being done is because they haven't gotten the answer they wanted yet.