hedwards: It's November 6th, but it may end up being pushed back a bit in New England because of the storm, but the safe harbor is only until December 11th IIRC, and the electoral college meets a week after that. So the worst case scenario would be another 6 weeks or so.
TVs_Frank: Dammit, I hope the election doesn't see it's shadow.
I can't stand six more weeks of this shit.
It's unlikely to go on that long, but it all depends upon how quickly things get resolved in New England. Ultimately those folks, outside of D. C. have the right to vote in this election, so the states would likely extend the deadline if need be. However, they do still have to assign their electors before the dead line.
I'm not over in that area, so I don't really know how long that's reasonably going to take.
hedwards: It's November 6th, but it may end up being pushed back a bit in New England because of the storm, but the safe harbor is only until December 11th IIRC, and the electoral college meets a week after that. So the worst case scenario would be another 6 weeks or so.
But, that doesn't count the time spent in courts when Romney loses the electoral college and goes on a fishing expedition to see which Democratic voters he can disenfranchise to serve his own selfish purposes.
Hmm, I guess we can all guess whom I voted for in that race.
mondo84: Ross Perot?
I actually kind of liked him. I think in my lifetime he was far and away the most successful 3rd party candidate that we have. And he always had those delightful graphs available to cite when he made claims.
I'm still not sure what Romney would do if elected, seems like he changes his mind every two weeks.