almabrds: Me too, I'm here since the beginning, and seeing them making this awful choice, makes me very sad... :(
The community is great, so I'll continue to browse the forums, and post occasionally.
But I won't give more money to GOG, this is the last time they show the middle finger to this customer.
RaikonLance: I've not been here as long, but pretending to be fair and fighting for us while at the same time just looking for maximum profits for themselves is something I will not tolerate.
I'm not sure it's GOG greed we're seeing, to be honest. If you look at the blog post about how they plan to keep the current tiered-pricing model, the conversions are pretty close. I mean, yeah, the Age of Wonders pricing is utter bullshit, but I'll lay 2:1 odds that that's publisher-dictated pricing. Triumph seems to be playing every scummy publisher trick in the deck (except, perhaps, microtransactions): bogus regional pricing, day-one DLC, etc.
I'm cautious as all hell, but I think we might be looking at Hanlon's Razor here -- "Never attribute to malice what can adequately explained by incompetence." Or, to be perhaps a bit more charitable, a well-intentioned but poorly considered mistake. Looking at their list, I personally don't see anything Triumph brings to the table that is really worth the loss of goodwill GOG is suffering on their behalf; a handful of cookie-cutter strategy games and a quirky Pikmin clone.
I think someone's too worried about getting more "AA+ games" that they're making the same mistakes that have kept the games industry in the grim state it's in: caving to the overreach of publishers. Just like I never expect to see any Zenimax games on GOG, because they'll go under before giving up their DRM, I'd rather GOG stand their ground on their core principles and disqualify this crap. Especially given these games, we really wouldn't be losing out on much compared to what we'd be keeping.
That CDPR is part of it, though... that's utterly mindboggling to me.