Enclave isn't my kind of game, but it's nice to see Starbreeze titles here.
Too bad The Darkness wasn't made for PC... :(
EDIT: ninja'd by apexultima. lol

Shibbyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

It's a good game, but not as good as "Blade: Edge of darkness" (hope we can see this one in GoG, it's one of my all time favourites)

I want some GOOD OLD Games again

horatiotupper
what are you talking about, this is a pretty awesome game, i have been playing it for about 4 hours now, and it is pretty good. How about you stop bitching about something you have no understanding of, and try it out.

Dont see why people are saying it is not worth buying i am having a blast on it. The game is 8 years old which is old in computer games land.
There are a stack of really good old games that a lot of people might not have heard of which at least get a chance now for people to play not just the ones people demand for this site to have i for one welcome any old game thats a good play.

I've got a good idea:
How about they just don't release anything else from now on or just take weeks and months before releasing a new game? I.e. wait until they can get the rights to sell a true classic.
Oh, I forgot. Even if they did only sell those types of games, there'd still be complainers. What's a classic in one person's eyes isn't in another person's eyes. And then there would also be complainers about it taking so long for new game releases.
Basically, they can't win. That said, it's alright mentioning what you think of a gameif it isn't so good or bad because it informs people who may want to buy it. Just let's leave the whole: I'd prefer them to release GOOD OLD GAMES again.

They're not forcing you to buy these games...

Exactly, Hobo.

I agree with Darth Manji, 2002 isn't old enough.
And yeah, MoM was the most fitting release in months, an actually good old game.

I don't know what's the deal with stating the opinion the we prefer older games. Either state your own opinion politely or take the hate elsewhere.

There was no hate on my part and I do consider the post rather polite. I was hardly swearing my head off or calling people names.
My issue isn't really with the complaints in this thread. It's rather the fact that it occurs whenever there's a new release (for the most part anyway). And what I said is true. Even if they did release a classic, I'm sure there would still be some people who are unhappy. There's no pleasing everyone at the end of the day and what one person finds rubbish, another will find good. (Unrelated: I've not played the game referenced in the thread)
Do keep in mind as well that I said it was okay to voice opinions about the games also.
And yes, 2002 isn't exactly a new game. Might be rather hard to find the game outside of the budget sections in shops. That is if the game is even sold these days when the web (like ebay) isn't factored into the equation.
Edit: I don't think a lot of people realise how much time it might take for old, classical games to be released either if that's all GoG focused on. There's the actual signing of the deals and then there's the whole process of testing the games.

Enclave wishlisted.
And waiting for Rune and Severance: Blade of Darkness. I've skipped those in the past, but people say so good things about them, that I feel I must play these games. :)
Really, no one is forcing you to buy it.
Like DavidGil said, I do prefer having some weekly releases (not so old games included, up to 2002 or even 2005 titles) than having 1 classic released by every 2 months only and nothing else: we would end a year with like 6 big titles on our accounts. Guess that wouldn't fit for everybody's tastes for games.

I would love to know the logic behind disliking releasing good not old games on gog, for max 9.99 and drm free.
I mean, seriously, wtf is your problem with getting newer than old games here? If you don't like them, DON'T BUY THEM.

Always wanted to try this one, ever since I got the original Riddick game.
Thank you GoG. Enclave wishlisted. :D