OH! The rapier wit of a man who looks to Alex Jones for 'facts'. Yes, that truly cuts to the core...

@CaptainKangaroo,

so you are content being a cow. Sad. Your funeral.

@CrapMatter

At lease Alex Jones CAREs about the constitution and his fellow man. What do YOU care about? Thursday''s new announcement? YOU desrve your fate, materialistic bastard.

I haven't even commented on the articles. But thank you again for proving my point

@CaptianCrunch

That you're a sub-servient cow? You're welcome.
You're up late, don't you work in the morning? Or are you on welfare? (I went there)

*popcorn*
This thread just keeps getting better!

You went to the welfare office? That's nice, though not exactly a shock that you've been unemployed.. You're obviously not very educated considering you don't even know that the word is subservient. Or that you didn't seem to know what the 3rd Amendment actually meant in your last topic. Maybe give college a shot? ( That's right I went there)



( yes I know this conversation is stupid everybody. But I said it wasn't worth having a serious discussion, I said nothing about a stupid conversation)

Hey man, I won't tolerate this racism. You people are so focused on proving how "enlightened" you are that you just focus on putting people down and using neutral terms as invectives. You claim that you support freedom, but it's clear that you only support your freedom to make yourself feel good with your masturbatory self-righteous statements.

So in the future, don't use cow as an insult.

As long as he doesn't present unrefutable proof that he isn't a cow (let's say a long form birth certificat), we can't really be sure he isn't a cow, now can we?

Aren't you scared that the globalists and their satanic overlords are going to throw you in the death camps for your internet activities?
Thats true. And what if he really is a reptile that just pretends to be a cow?

Thank you for being a voice of reason. The gibber and garble can be suffocating at times. I don't want to waste your time but your strong denouncement of Obama made me curious since I often agree with your viewpoints.
I haven't been very good at following US politics in the later years but my impression of Obama has been that although he has mostly been a disappointment he seem to have some good values and do some good things when he can? His opposition towards the SOPA being a good example although that could just be a calculated move to get more support. My intuition is that he is a better man than most of the Democrats in Congress and Senate and certainly compared to the anti-intellectual rabble and Christian extremists that makes up most of the Republican party. Any articles you would recommend?

Edit: To clarify, my opinion of him (so far) is that he is better than most US politicians, but not good.

My problem is that he often says one thing and does another, your example of him denouncing SOPA if of course a good thing, but he has a history of threatening to veto (or when he was in the Senate not vote for stuff) and then when the time came he went ahead and passed whatever it was and just complained about it. Now, I don't think the POTUS has superpowers or that he can act unilaterally, but at best he seems rather weak willed (at worst he's a very effective liar and deceitful person). I cannot say why he does what I'm charitably (compared to how it looks) describing as "caving", I just know he does it and on a regular basis.

Also, Bush may have been a bad president, but he was a bully and he got stuff ramrodded through that I never thought could have happened. Now, I don't think abuse of process is good, but Bush did some things like using his public pulpit to call people out on the floor (which I suppose one might call bullying, but I think it's unfair to call it that in this context) and make them look like what they were, or sometimes just how he wanted them to look.

I guess what I'm saying is Obama could do way more than he does. He's caved or given up on some pretty important issues. He's said the Justice Department will no longer do X and then has sat back and let them do X (where X is a rather negative thing) over and over again.

Again, at best he's kind of a spineless guy, at worst, well, he's a politician. Still, I don't think it's fair to blame him for things that he actually didn't do or for getting cock-blocked by Republicans when he actually did try to do the right thing.

Good point. The president do have a lot of power in the US. He should be able to do more.

Alex Jones cares about his listener numbers, you jibbering idiot. He doesn't give a fuck about you, or any other listener, beyond that. As for what I care about : the people close to me. As opposed to you, who cares about coming off like an especially dim witted mongoloid while desperately attempting to debate. Nice life.

And what are you doing on a gaming forum? Don't you have an apocalyptic police state to prepare to fight? Those weapons aren't going to stash themselves, dude!

No you moron. I asked if YOU are on welfare. "I went there" means I'm calling you out.
Because you sure spend a lot of time on a game forum at odd times. The signs of an unemployed or an obsessive. I have a job, I go after people that don't pay their bills. So you can be afraid of that or not, I don't care.

@CrapMatter

Oh your insults wound me not at all. You're a Canadian so your opinions about America do NOT matter. Kay? Go back to your socialist lifestyle.

You guys don't want an argument, stop reading every bloody post. The original post is about NEW bills (that is a fact) being introduced by 112th congress to invade the privacy of Americans. Go read the bloody bills instead of assuming you know jack shit. Bunch of lazy asses in America.

It's not a gaming post hence "General Discussion". Want a gaming post go read a gaming post.

Nice job trying to derail the original topic by the way, but you failed to. It's going back on topic effective now. You can continue bitching if you want in an non-gaming thread but it's your own fault for reading a non-gaming post.

Good luck trying to explain that logic.