nondeplumage: Certainly. The difference between wanting to sell something based on a property is much different than wanting to sell something based on a property.
You have to know that's a gross oversimplification. That's like equating a telethon with a sitcom and saying "Yeah, wanting to get money from people watching television is ENTIRELY different from wanting to get money from people watching television".
The difference here is that content was made and existed FIRST. The process wasn't molded plastic>cartoon, but comic>film>cartoon>molded plastic. Those creative levels BEFORE "molded plastic", and the fact that they ARE before "molded plastic" are more than just a semantic difference.
Again, it's great that you get to sit back and make sarcastic potshots without ever having to back YOURSELF up, but maybe you could actually choose between participating or not.
And thinking that original content should be preferred over over an established content presumes that originality = good in the first place. You've got a 1 in 10 chance that's true.
Sturgeon's Law is great and all, but I'm pretty sure there's a difference between making an original property and then making toys from it and making a toy and then crafting a 30 minute ad around it. This is true of other distributions as well, you know, the ones that don't START with the molded plastic.