It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I dont get what is wrong with the GOG installers. The all in one style installer is the best i've seen.
avatar
gameon: I dont get what is wrong with the GOG installers. The all in one style installer is the best i've seen.
Same here. I've never had any problem with them.
avatar
jungletoad: Not that you don't have a point, but you make it in about the most obnoxious and whiny way possible.
I agree 100% with you. The worst whiny way to ask for a zipped download option. There isn't a problem with the installers in the first place... (-_-). And it isn't hard to make "portable" an installed game. Just a very basic knowledge.
Most wanted feature for games: PORTABLE MODE
Not really... No.
avatar
Azrael360: There isn't a problem with the installers in the first place... (-_-). And it isn't hard to make "portable" an installed game. Just a very basic knowledge.
There is a problem. First, it doesn't work on just any computer. You need admin privilege access, otherwise, it just won't install.

Secondly, there is no easy way to make the install portable, unless the GOG installer clearly SHOWS what it's doing (which should be the default behaviour, especially for such clunky self-installers), or all the files are clearly accessible from the start through an archive, not an encrypted .exe container.

This might sound whiny to some self-righteous snobs out there, but I paid for softwares that I already owned on CD before. Why do I have to resort to getting back to my old CDs in order to get a hold of the files I purchased again? Why do I have to resort to downloading cracks in order to make the applications portable? I think it's a legitimate request.

I'm not even complaining. I'm asking for improvements in GOG's ways of doing things, as I care and wish to see them succeed.
Post edited October 29, 2012 by glubbar
I don't know any Linux distro users who don't have a secondary Windows computer for gaming, or a Windows install on a partition on their Linux machine.

Just saying.
I forgot to add that using "innounp" the Inno Setup Unpacker (GOG use Inno Setup to make their containers) I couldn't get a hold of what's written in the registry.
It's probably in "Install-script.iss" but I have no clue.

Perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps it is just too much to ask of GOG.com
Post edited October 29, 2012 by glubbar
avatar
Dzsono: My particular favourite is to have .NET 4.0 included as I don't like having it installed on my system all the time for just one or two programs.
avatar
Nirth: Why not?

I just tried the application with Ultima 7 from GOG and apparently after the installation during post-snapshots Cameyo freezes for some reason. I gave it admin rights and turned off security applications. :/
I run very slim systems and .NET 4.0 has a background process. Innocuous by itself, but adds up very quickly because every program these days has a background process.

I've used some of the free Cameyo downloads and it seems to be alright. I've never used their software, however. Try using or [url=http://jauntepe.sourceforge.net/index.html]JauntePE if you continue to have trouble with Cameyo. My experience is that a lot of trial and error is needed before you find something that works perfectly for you, but it's worth the effort!
Thanks for the reply. Indeed some nice folks have suggested things like Cameyo.

Cameyo did the trick sometimes (with a lot of tweaking around and reading of course), but my original request was mostly so that the GOG installers would become more transparent or at least would clearly show what they are doing on the system. I know it's not automatic with the Inno Setup, but I don't know... there should be some thinking put into that.

The best thing would be to have some sort of technology that would isolate the application into a folder just like Cameyo does, but I fear that would be too much to ask for.