whodares2: People just need to have a little faith. GOG would not do anything so crazy as to destroy their fan base. They know what they need in order to continue to be successful and it is.....us.
True, but if I may, I think I can present both sides. I think the people who are against GOG moving towards newer games tend to be actually the newer customers - like me and more recent. Comparatively, they've only just found this site and its emphasis on classic gaming and would hate to see GOG lose part of its identity so soon nor do they feel it's ready to take on the behemoth that is Steam (which from the interview the French Monk has flat-out stated they aren't planning on doing with this move). Conversely people who have been on this site for awhile, who have seen GOG grow, are ready to see GOG take DRM-free, customer-friendly gaming to the next stage - newer games. Now obviously there are older and younger site-members on both sides of the issue, but this is the trend as I see it from reading the posts on the topic.
Regardless of the longevity of the poster, both sides each have a point: GOG is special partly because of its boutique nature with its emphasis on reviving classic games. But a healthy business needs to grow and, especially as time goes by, GOG will only be able to grow so fast on offering games 4+ years old. Further, showing that DRM-free gaming works in general and not just for old games is an important step to take for the game industry - the taking of which GOG is ideal for. I don't think they'll alienate anybody really, but I understand the reticence of some people with respect to GOG offering newer games. It's very much part of GOG's identity and specialness and not just because "Old" is in its name. :)