It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
triock: Ok, I'm in for something nasty as well. :p
Added to the players list.
avatar
Novotnus: Is it still possible to enter? :)
If there are an even number of players when I come to start, you'll be added.
Post edited June 06, 2013 by xyem
How can we change the rules? Must be a 75% agreement among the players?
avatar
xyem: If there are an even number of players when I come to start, you'll be added.
Thanks!
avatar
GabiMoro: How can we change the rules? Must be a 75% agreement among the players?
Yup, that's the initial rule regarding the rule changing. Anyone can propose the rule change and if 75% of the players agree, it'll change the rules of the game. A first one might even be to change the percentage required!

Obviously, I will hold some veto power to prevent some possible unreasonable rules (like "person X can't play").
Now I am not in for this one but the communication by text seems fuzzy? Does that mean only in this thread or by PMs only and who is going to monitor the PMs then?

My suggestion would be to have the negotiations happen here in this thread and any case sensitive matters being sent by PM via you Xyem so you can monitor and make sure no illegal transactions go on ;)
Post edited June 06, 2013 by SirEyeball
avatar
SirEyeball: Now I am not in for this one but the communication by text seems fuzzy? Does that mean only in this thread or by PMs only and who is going to monitor the PMs then?
I added that rule to stop people using the PM I send them as visual proof (e.g. screenshotting it).. or rather, stop them doing so immediately. Who knows, that may be the first rule to go!

avatar
SirEyeball: My suggestion would be to have the negotiations happen here in this thread and any case sensitive matters being sent by PM via you Xyem so you can monitor and make sure no illegal transactions go on ;)
There will be a proper thread for this game to take place in, this is more of a "recruitment" thread. What do you mean by "illegal transactions"?
avatar
SirEyeball: Now I am not in for this one but the communication by text seems fuzzy? Does that mean only in this thread or by PMs only and who is going to monitor the PMs then?
avatar
xyem: I added that rule to stop people using the PM I send them as visual proof (e.g. screenshotting it).. or rather, stop them doing so immediately. Who knows, that may be the first rule to go!

avatar
SirEyeball: My suggestion would be to have the negotiations happen here in this thread and any case sensitive matters being sent by PM via you Xyem so you can monitor and make sure no illegal transactions go on ;)
avatar
xyem: There will be a proper thread for this game to take place in, this is more of a "recruitment" thread. What do you mean by "illegal transactions"?
Don't rightly know about what is illegal but it could be secret negotiations and the like;) codes should be sent by PM to keep them secret though

Again I know I am not playing this round but the game itself does sound fun and I hope it will inspire to other games coming up (Might even do one myself if that is allowed and this works) ;)
Post edited June 06, 2013 by SirEyeball
avatar
SirEyeball: Don't rightly know about what is illegal but it could be secret negotiations and the like;) codes should be sent by PM to keep them secret though
Secret negotiations aren't illegal. If some players want to try to band together in secret, that's possible (with the current ruleset).

avatar
SirEyeball: Again I know I am not playing this round but the game itself does sound fun and I hope it will inspire to other games coming up (Might even do one myself if that is allowed and this works) ;)
You could always join in and try to convince the others to change the prize to, or add, Wizardry 8 :P Or, if you are lucky enough to get a valid part of the code, you could trade it for Wizardry 8...

Of course, I couldn't stop you if you wanted to run a similar type of game yourself, but I would appreciate it if you used the same method that I am going to for running multiple Dogma games at the same time. Basically, the current ruleset would be copied to the new game with some tweaks and then run as a separate series, possibly remerging in the future.

So for example, if a rule is about to removed but I think it makes for an interesting element of gameplay, I would branch off a new game and make that rule changeable only by a unanimous vote (regardless of what vote % is required for other dogma).
avatar
SirEyeball: Don't rightly know about what is illegal but it could be secret negotiations and the like;) codes should be sent by PM to keep them secret though
avatar
xyem: Secret negotiations aren't illegal. If some players want to try to band together in secret, that's possible (with the current ruleset).

avatar
SirEyeball: Again I know I am not playing this round but the game itself does sound fun and I hope it will inspire to other games coming up (Might even do one myself if that is allowed and this works) ;)
avatar
xyem: You could always join in and try to convince the others to change the prize to, or add, Wizardry 8 :P Or, if you are lucky enough to get a valid part of the code, you could trade it for Wizardry 8...

Of course, I couldn't stop you if you wanted to run a similar type of game yourself, but I would appreciate it if you used the same method that I am going to for running multiple Dogma games at the same time. Basically, the current ruleset would be copied to the new game with some tweaks and then run as a separate series, possibly remerging in the future.

So for example, if a rule is about to removed but I think it makes for an interesting element of gameplay, I would branch off a new game and make that rule changeable only by a unanimous vote (regardless of what vote % is required for other dogma).
I will actually wait and see how this plays out first and then I would PM you for any particulars so it would be the end rules of this GA that persists in the new one. I will sit this one out as the ones playing deserves the Rabbit game but will watch gladly from the sidelines as a spectator
id be interested if recruitment is still ongoing.

NotR
wiz8
wiz6+7
Deponia2

many others would interest me as well

+1s for xyem even if i missed the recruitment window
^_^
avatar
SirEyeball: I will actually wait and see how this plays out first and then I would PM you for any particulars so it would be the end rules of this GA that persists in the new one. I will sit this one out as the ones playing deserves the Rabbit game but will watch gladly from the sidelines as a spectator
Fair enough.

I really want to get this started! It's a nice feeling knowing that someone else thinks it is going to be an interesting enough setup to be worth running their own :)
avatar
ErekoseDM: id be interested if recruitment is still ongoing.
I'm going to go ahead and get this started. 9 players for NotR are available and I think that is a sweet spot for the first game. You've been included!
I'm completely lost... but I wanna see blood!..
Origin #0 (our first game) will be here

Information for the players will be sent shortly.

EDIT: Information has been sent to all the players!
Post edited June 06, 2013 by xyem
avatar
Momo1991: I think the rules would be like the nasty GA with one prize only - not sure how Xyem is thinking though.

The last nasty GA, I wasn't in but apparently my enthusiasm to watch the game and my posting in the thread convinced quite a number of participants to think I was in - it was rather hilarious. I even threw some fake sections to peeps that refused to believe me after several PM's trying to convince them that I really wasn't playing. Of course I let Wpegg in on all the action!
avatar
BlueMooner: You're naughty. ; ) I'ma haffa keep my eyez on you.
I TRIED to be nice but some peeps just wouldn't believe me ~innocent face~