It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
avatar
SirPrimalform: I looked at today's promo and there are a couple of games that interest me... but I actually have a vast and embarrassing backlog so I'm in no way short of games to play.

In the past I would have bought these games that interest me partially because I for some reason enjoy collecting GOGs but also because I wanted to reward GOG a bit for doing what they were doing.

I didn't think I would, but I think I am actually going to boycott GOG until they change their mind (or clarify in a way that I agree with). Obviously if they go through with these policies then I'm done with them for good, but I think I'll boycott until either things turn nice again or they lose me permanently.
I pretty much feel similar to you, would you kindly make some room for me on that bench of yours? :D

avatar
CarrionCrow: Why yes, I was indeed previously aware that a larger world does in fact exist, as opposed to the United States floating in some void all by itself. As to my attitude, what would that be?
avatar
Matruchus: And by the way all of us here is exposed to american culture daily over tv, news and so one so we do know what America is all about even if we never where there, and that is profit over dead bodies.
Well, I'm personally not a big fan of american culture but this way of thinking I'm not a fan either. What appears on medias is not always truly defining of a culture...
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Zoidberg
avatar
Matruchus: Well I do agree that a lot of them are not good but that should be for the buyer to decide and not gog.
Yes, but they can't bring everything, either. Everything they release incurs costs from the legal, technical and marketing teams, so if they don't think it'll be worth the cost, they won't bother. Can't blame them for that.

I guarantee that GOG is not going to snub their noses at a game that could make them a profit just because one guy on staff doesn't like it. Hasn't this entire thread been about what ruthless profiteers they are? :p
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Mentalepsy
avatar
Matruchus: Agree with that they are spoiled with low pricing.
You realize some of us are against regional pricing too right (even if it doesn't immediately impact us)? And are you also aware that the US has massive disparities between wages, living standards, and etc. of the various economic brackets?

(This is directed at the thread starting to gravitate towards "F 'MURIKA")
avatar
Matruchus: Well I do agree that a lot of them are not good but that should be for the buyer to decide and not gog.
avatar
Mentalepsy: Yes, but they can't bring everything, either. Everything they release incurs costs from the legal, technical and marketing teams, so if they don't think it'll be worth the cost, they won't bother. Can't blame them for that.

I guarantee that GOG is not going to snub their noses at a game that could make them a profit just because one guy on staff doesn't like it. Hasn't this entire thread been about what ruthless profiteers they are? :p
I know they cant bring them all but at least some off more known old games could come here.
avatar
Matruchus: Agree with that they are spoiled with low pricing.
avatar
tammerwhisk: You realize some of us are against regional pricing too right (even if it doesn't immediately impact us)? And are you also aware that the US has massive disparities between wages, living standards, and etc. of the various economic brackets?

(This is directed at the thread starting to gravitate towards "F 'MURIKA")
I know it has. I know about millions unemployed in America but it is the same here or even worse. Not to begin that you dont have social security, publich health system, insurance. But you have lower prices.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Matruchus
avatar
CarrionCrow: Why yes, I was indeed previously aware that a larger world does in fact exist, as opposed to the United States floating in some void all by itself. As to my attitude, what would that be?
avatar
Matruchus: And by the way all of us here is exposed to american culture daily over tv, news and so one so we do know what America is all about even if we never where there, and that is profit over dead bodies.
That's part of the whole repressive thing going on here. Lots of violence, weird problems with sex, crossed wires on that grand-scale level. Was referring to something more in-depth, since the news and TV are about 99.99999 percent bullshit on any given day.

Also, GOG could come up to me right now and tell me that as a way to take one for the global team, I needed to pay more for each and every game I purchased. Charge me the extra 33 to 50 percent. I'd keep on grabbing my games on sale just like I have been. I'm very much aware that people are united worldwide in getting fucked over. If I truly didn't give a shit, I'd slap the indifferent American stereotype on like a warm blanket, bask in my nonexistent expectation and keep on quietly laughing at the poor suckers getting reamed. But I'm not. All bullshit, all sarcasm and all chat snottiness aside, I continue to think that it isn't right. I've still got a wishlist as long as my arm and a backlog that could choke ten elephants, but even if I didn't, I wouldn't be dropping my cash on AOW 3 right now.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by CarrionCrow
low rated
avatar
Matruchus: Agree with that they are spoiled with low pricing.
avatar
tammerwhisk: You realize some of us are against regional pricing too right (even if it doesn't immediately impact us)? And are you also aware that the US has massive disparities between wages, living standards, and etc. of the various economic brackets?

(This is directed at the thread starting to gravitate towards "F 'MURIKA")
it doesnt help when uneducated sociopathic obese macdonalds eating diabetes ravaged americans chime in with bad attitudes towards other people expressing their vitirol or opinions on topics that directly affect them.

Most muricans dont give a shit , you however might be in the minority
Post edited February 28, 2014 by paulrainer
avatar
Matruchus: And by the way all of us here is exposed to american culture daily over tv, news and so one so we do know what America is all about even if we never where there, and that is profit over dead bodies.
avatar
CarrionCrow: That's part of the whole repressive thing going on here. Lots of violence, weird problems with sex, crossed wires on that grand-scale level. Was referring to something more in-depth, since the news and TV are about 99.99999 percent bullshit on any given day.
Well thats all we know and thats what we base our findings on. But i do know some americans and they really have a bad superior in everything attiuted - even to trying to pay with dollars in eu retail shops which really pisses people off.

Look the truth is also that a lot americans really think there is nothing else other besides us and i don't hate us i just think its to exagerated at the moment.

Lets just stopp with this your better then me stuff on this thread ok it does not change anything with the goes new regional priced games policy.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Matruchus
low rated
no..really america is a fantastic country , its just the people who live there that make it shit.
avatar
GabiMoro: It doesn't matter what tax would be. Let's say VAT. We are almost half to 50% anyway :).
The point is: How could GOG still sell in Romania and keep the same price? They would sell at a loss. Or they could raise prices in all countries so they keep the flat price in the whole world. It's absurd. The flat price is very hard to maintain, it's a wonder they keep it for so long. What other store still keep the same price for everyone? They are lesser every day.
GOG doesn't sell in Romania. They sell from Poland.

If Romania put up a 50% VAT, then that would just make GOG prices look better than retail stores in Romania. Romanian retail stores would go bankrupt. GOG would still sell from Poland.

That is what this is all about. Many AAA new releases are distributed by retail chains around the world. Those retail chains don't like the idea that GOG could sell them at a significant price reduction because of being online. The same argument is levied at Amazon, and practically every other online retailer that is competing with a retail store.

Those retail chain then bully publishers and developers, who in turn, bully online distributors like GOG. GOG was standing up to this bullying. Now they are not. In the end, it is the consumer that has lost out.

This isn't something to be happy or positive about, it is something to be angry or sad about. It might not be GOG's fault, but GOG were the ones that were standing up for the consumer. Now this is not the case. The GOG community has a lost a champion of Worldwide Pricing, and that champion was GOG itself.
avatar
GabiMoro: It doesn't matter what tax would be. Let's say VAT. We are almost half to 50% anyway :)
Erm, yeah, and a quarter to being plain robbed of all goods anyway. o.O
avatar
Matruchus: I know it has. I know about millions unemployed in America but it is the same here or even worse. Not to begin that you dont have social security, publich health system, insurance. But you have lower prices.
Lower is a relative term, seeing as how most of us struggle just to make enough income to get food.

The middle class isn't existant anymore >_>
avatar
tammerwhisk: You realize some of us are against regional pricing too right (even if it doesn't immediately impact us)? And are you also aware that the US has massive disparities between wages, living standards, and etc. of the various economic brackets?

(This is directed at the thread starting to gravitate towards "F 'MURIKA")
avatar
paulrainer: it doesnt help when uneducated sociopathic obese macdonalds eating diabetes ravaged americans chime in with bad attitudes towards other people expressing their vitirol or opinions on topics that directly affect them.

Most muricans dont give a shit , you however might be in the minority
Here's the thing, just for clarification's sake. When I said I don't give a shit? I said that towards you because you were behaving like an asshole. If anything, your immediate use of stereotype and attempted insult verifies that to me.

And just for further clarification, I am not for one nanosecond implying that Russians are somehow inferior or deficient in any way, shape or form. I'm referring solely to you as your own person and how you were acting like an asshole. See? No need for stereotypes.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by CarrionCrow
low rated
avatar
paulrainer: it doesnt help when uneducated sociopathic obese macdonalds eating diabetes ravaged americans chime in with bad attitudes towards other people expressing their vitirol or opinions on topics that directly affect them.

Most muricans dont give a shit , you however might be in the minority
avatar
CarrionCrow: Here's the thing, just for clarification's sake. When I said I don't give a shit? I said that towards you because you were behaving like an asshole. If anything, your immediate use of stereotype and attempted insult verifies that to me.
good for you - now go and have a mcdonalds in celebration
avatar
CarrionCrow: Why yes, I was indeed previously aware that a larger world does in fact exist, as opposed to the United States floating in some void all by itself. As to my attitude, what would that be?
avatar
Matruchus: And by the way all of us here is exposed to american culture daily over tv, news and so one so we do know what America is all about even if we never where there, and that is profit over dead bodies.
Is GoG not a for profit business? What exactly does this have to with Americans? You're right, Americans care about profit, it's called capitalism and it's what our country was founded on. But a business is a business and GoG is trying to run one. When you're running a business, if you want to succeed you don't settle for the scraps, you go after the big pieces. This is what GoG is trying to do. They are going after market share. They may be 2nd (according to them) in digital distributors, but that's 2nd with a 5% market share while Steam has 95%, worldwide I might add. They are just trying to increase that and that's is impossible with things staying status quo.
I am still disappointed, it's a step backwards.

Most AAA games are now designed around "always-connected" experiences, like seamless single-player to multi-player switch, and DLC stores and stuff that inherently have DRM even if it's not implemented as strict DRM. the PS4 and Xbox One are going 200% this way and most big devs and publishers are following.

Throwing away one of GoG's core value, for a few AAA games that will be actually be GoG (or DRM-free) compatible or worth buying at all seems like a mistake.

I would have loved to see GoG expand to linux instead to better support distribution of new indie games, which are more often GoG friendly in the way they develop and distribute games.

The other issue with this decision, is that it is essentially saying that GoG needs to ship AAA to stay alive.
But the AAA market is very competitive. publishers will put a lot of pressure on GoG to do whatever they say. Even if GoG actually does not give in to DRM, who knows what else they will be forced to do...