It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
avatar
GabiMoro: "And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!)"... on top of the page.
I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
avatar
GabiMoro: "And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!)"... on top of the page.
avatar
blotunga: I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
Yeah they said at one time yesterday on this thread that they are trying to get them here and that we should trust them - as if with what they did now.
avatar
GabiMoro: "And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!)"... on top of the page.
avatar
blotunga: I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
avatar
blotunga: I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
avatar
GabiMoro: Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
The thing is that not just some off us are screwed by the price. Its because most off us are screwed because the price. With AOW3 almoust 64% of us. Look at the AOW3 regional pricing thread.
avatar
Matruchus: Yeah they said at one time yesterday on this thread that they are trying to get them here and that we should trust them - as if with what they did now.
And still there are some older games (even from studios on gog) which are not here. I wonder what would've been needed to get for example the original Dungeon Siege games with expansions for example.
avatar
Matruchus: Yeah they said at one time yesterday on this thread that they are trying to get them here and that we should trust them - as if with what they did now.
avatar
blotunga: And still there are some older games (even from studios on gog) which are not here. I wonder what would've been needed to get for example the original Dungeon Siege games with expansions for example.
I don't know but they don't seem to be trying anymore since they wen't with we want to sell new games one or two years ago.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Matruchus
avatar
blotunga: I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
avatar
GabiMoro: Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
It's not to do with affording it, it's to do with GOG massively compromising their principles.
avatar
GabiMoro: Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
I *can* afford it. But I'm not willing to pay $62 for a game (which btw will probably have lots of DLCs coming). $62 in my book is a lot of money, I mean I pay less than half for electricity than that.
avatar
SirPrimalform: It's not to do with affording it, it's to do with GOG massively compromising their principles.
^And this also.
Plus I have my own principles - never preorder. Wait until a game is "complete" with all Add-ons (I have violated this a couple of times and paid 3x the price I would've if I would've waited and still didn't had time to play the game).
Post edited February 28, 2014 by blotunga
avatar
Matruchus: No trolling just pointing out gog policy.
They have a lots of games at a 70% discount right now, what are you talking they have no discounts?
http://www.gog.com/promo/classic_adventures_weekend_promo_280214
avatar
Matruchus: No trolling just pointing out gog policy.
GOG has loads of sales where the games are discounted the same even if you buy one. You've not been paying attention.
This regional pricing makes sense but don't rip off Euro customers as Apple or other big brands do ! I have been playing pirated games a lot in the past and GOG changed that with its great concept of DRM free games at a reasonable price.

Adding quality new indie games to the catalog is also welcome but we would equally be delighted to have classics from Microsoft (Midtown Madness, Motocross Madness, Rise of Nations) and Firaxis (Civilization) as well.
avatar
Matruchus: No trolling just pointing out gog policy.
avatar
SirPrimalform: GOG has loads of sales where the games are discounted the same even if you buy one. You've not been paying attention.
O I have but all the games I wan't are always in same discount type. If you buy 5 games you get 80% off, if you buy one you get 40% - example baldurs gate and all that series. And i can really pass on that discriminating type off discount.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Matruchus
avatar
GabiMoro: They have a lots of games at a 70% discount right now, what are you talking they have no discounts?
http://www.gog.com/promo/classic_adventures_weekend_promo_280214
I wonder why the Feeble files is not included. Oh well, I have to think about completing my collections. Though for example I've already bought Syberia 2 on groupees so no completing there.
avatar
blotunga: I might have missed that... Adhd :D. And this is why they shouldn't have sold out themselves. I would've rather waited for the games to become classics and then get them here. And basically every 4+ year old game is old. They should try to get those here (and complete with all DLCs/expansions etc).
avatar
GabiMoro: Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
But still it is a bit artificial to make nice prices for some regions now but not for all. It seems unfair that some regions are compared to what they can pay or just on an absolute scale have to pay so much more than others. Just because the publisher likes it that way doesn't really mean it's a good thing. I guess that regional pricing will make the prices higher on average for all of us, even if we all wait several years before buying. The idea is simply to charge as much as they can, therefore I think the prices will be higher. But who knows.

I just wonder what will happen if GOG cannot get tons of AAA games with this regional pricing. What if publishers also insist on some form of DRM before they release all their really nice new games? 3 AA+ titles and what else they will get might not be enough and then this whole regional pricing thing would have been in vain. I guess it's a bit of a gambling from GOG's side or maybe they know more...
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Trilarion
avatar
GabiMoro: Yes, but we must think to other people too. Some could afford and buy this game NOW. Why would they wait? Just because some of us are screwed by the price? If I don't like the price I'll ignore the game until I can afford it.
avatar
Trilarion: But still it is a bit artificial to make nice prices for some regions now but not for all. It seems unfair that some regions are compared to what they can pay or just on an absolute scale have to pay so much more than others. Just because the publisher likes it that way doesn't really mean it's a good thing. I guess that regional pricing will make the prices higher on average for all of us, even if we all wait several years before buying. The idea is simply to charge as much as they can, therefore I think the prices will be higher. But who knows.

I just wonder what will happen if GOG cannot get tons of AAA games with this regional pricing. What if publishers also insist on some form of DRM before they release all they nice new games? 3 AA+ titles plus what else they will get might not be enough and then this whole regional pricing thing would have been in vain.
Yeah thats right. The problem is that most AAA games comes drm only and publishers wont allow that to change. And drm is always bound to regional pricing. And to be frank there are no real AAA titles on Gog now.
Post edited February 28, 2014 by Matruchus