It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
avatar
Trilarion: The same way that the people who are against it now are still here.
Staying for the community doesn't neccesarily mean buying the games here.
81 pages of replies , 1500+ posts and no comment from GOG. wow..just wow!


i think we need to remember with the gog guys being french i guess they are used to surrendering , so when publishers want to bend them over , they just drop their pants and take it like champions.
avatar
paulrainer: 81 pages of replies , 1500+ posts and no comment from GOG. wow..just wow!

i think we need to remember with the gog guys being french i guess they are used to surrendering , so when publishers want to bend them over , they just drop their pants and take it like champions.
Not true, did you read all pages? Blue text posts are still here and are reasonable. However there are several people who overreact for the worse, like steam community mindless folk who don't have their own opinion only repeat tried and true slogans.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by HenitoKisou
avatar
cmdr_flashheart: If that happens, then I don't see DRM-free gaming lasting anywhere. I would be worried at that point.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: To be fair*, if it's a case of complying to national/ local laws then it's understandable, otherwise they'd be breaking the law and that could get pretty ugly pretty fast. But that has always the potential to be lifted if/ when legislation changes.

When it comes to publisher/ developer demands - IMHO, when you introduce regional pricing there's almost always that one pub/ dev that would demand the system to be enforced effectively and absolutely. Region locking is one such way. And yes, it is DRM and it's bad, that's why I asked for clarification on the baggages that come with regional pricing.

* hm, I probably shouldn't have used "fair", it's being thrown around too much lately ;-P
You'll hate me for saying this, but I am not as much concerned with region locking-type DRM as much as I am with the kind of DRM which requires internet connection/ account verification/ game supervision to let games work. But certainly, I dislike region locking which can be used to carry out censorship laws.

We'll just have to wait and see, but my guess is that it makes sense to make regional pricing work on GOG not via regionally locked keys, but via Amazon style region stores, where you pay the prices of XYZ region if you're from there. But it relies on the honor system, of course, which we're not unfamiliar with- if we want, we could dl GOG's entire library, or upload it for others.
avatar
Lilim: ...Are we asking wrong questions, or what? ...
avatar
Trilarion: I guess they would say that they explained already everything that they can and want to explain. Although the gifting question is a valid one, if you ask me.
The whole regional lock's questions are valid. Using a proxy is not rocket science and many people will do a lot to get hold of some games for 1/3 of their original price (yes, I mean the prices for Russia, but also Poland). Regional locks are a "natural" solution for this.

I do have trust in GOG, even though I feel really bad about this whole situation (and I mean changing one of the core principles and how it was handled), but I don't have so much faith in people in general. Lower prices are tempting, developers/publishers won't like how easy it is to "screw them over" and GOG is left with a hell of a situation with apparently no idea what to do next.
Quoted for truth:
GOG made a promise, they broke that promise and have lost the trust and good-will that they had earned. At least Steam has always been honest about being c*nts.
avatar
goral: Dawajcie tu jakiegoś Polaka, a nie Anglika co nawet nie zna warunków życia w Polsce. Strzeliliście sobie w stopę tym idiotycznym ruchem, gratuluję.
Google Translate:

Come here a Pole, not the Englishman did not even know the living conditions in Poland. Strzeliliście themselves in the foot this idiotic move, congratulations.
avatar
Shendue: ...
If those newest games were my primary concern, i wouldn't even care about GOG existing. I can buy those everywhere. In fact, i would buy the retail versions for collecting purposes, preferably.
...
Can you get them DRM-free, though? I am hoping that GOG brings more DRM-free big and AAA titles.
avatar
paulrainer: 81 pages of replies , 1500+ posts and no comment from GOG. wow..just wow!

i think we need to remember with the gog guys being french i guess they are used to surrendering , so when publishers want to bend them over , they just drop their pants and take it like champions.
avatar
HenitoKisou: Not true, did you read all pages? Blue text posts are still here and are reasonable. However there are several people who overreact for the worse, like steam community mindless folk who don't have their own opinion only repeat tried and true slogans.
Blue text posts? All 4 of them? All posted within an hour from the letter itself :-)

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/letter_from_the_md_about_regional_pricing/?staff=yes
avatar
spyder256: What??!! Why??! All this over 3 fucking games. What a bunch of melodramatic bull shit.
My though exactly. If you are so against regional pricing, boycott the games that are involved, but the whole web site???...

Personally, what they pay in other countries doesn't affect me. If the price is right, I'll get it and if it isn't, I'll pass.

Though as previously voiced, I do think it should be cheaper is low income countries.

avatar
Lilim: Blue text posts? All 4 of them? All posted within an hour from the letter itself :-)

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/letter_from_the_md_about_regional_pricing/?staff=yes
Well, they can't pay someone full time just to manage this thread. There are over 1.5k posts at this point and I expect, quite a lot of repetition from posters who don't feel like reading the content of the 1.5k posts that preceeded theirs.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Magnitus
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Just a hypothetical question:

IF the people who do not like that GOG.com abandoned one of it's core values vote with their wallet, and IF that is enough to get GOG.com to go back to DRM-free + flat price(But less new games as a result), would the people who are okay with this decision leave GOG.com for other stores were they have all the newest games?
avatar
Shendue: If those newest games were my primary concern, i wouldn't even care about GOG existing. I can buy those everywhere. In fact, i would buy the retail versions for collecting purposes, preferably.
I registered to GOG to play retrogames and indie games. I don't mind them expanding their selection of games just with indie ones, if that means keeping their fair price policy.
I guess that begs the question:

"Does GOG.com know it's customer base?"
avatar
Shendue: ...
If those newest games were my primary concern, i wouldn't even care about GOG existing. I can buy those everywhere. In fact, i would buy the retail versions for collecting purposes, preferably.
...
avatar
cmdr_flashheart: Can you get them DRM-free, though? I am hoping that GOG brings more DRM-free big and AAA titles.
but these 3 games arent even triple A games - they are in all honesty a bit shitty
- i mean whoever at GOG thought that selling out to get these games was a good i dea needs to be beaten until they turn blue with their own shoes.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by paulrainer
avatar
Trilarion: The same way that the people who are against it now are still here.
avatar
Maighstir: Staying for the community doesn't neccesarily mean buying the games here.
Exactly. I'll keep posting here when i'm in the mood but that doesn't mean that i'm buying games on GOG.
high rated

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit
Well, Regional pricing is shit as well;)

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue...
You know why is retail big chunk of revenues? Because it is cheaper than digital because of the stupid industry standard to set digital prices higher (especially in areas like Europe). I doubt that gog can do much about it, but why would anyone buy digital copy when physical copy often offer more (physical stuff) and is actually cheaper? And why would publishers ignore retail if they sell more thanks to this total abomination of free market...

Do not get me wrong, AAA games without DRM are awesome, but regional pricing is the next bad thing and you know it.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by NetAndy
avatar
goral: Dawajcie tu jakiegoś Polaka, a nie Anglika co nawet nie zna warunków życia w Polsce. Strzeliliście sobie w stopę tym idiotycznym ruchem, gratuluję.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Google Translate:

Come here a Pole, not the Englishman did not even know the living conditions in Poland. Strzeliliście themselves in the foot this idiotic move, congratulations.
Google translate has some major problems with Polish ;-) Let me get it for you:
Give us a Pole here, not an Englishman who doesn't know a thing about living conditions in Poland. You've shot yourselves in the foot with this dumb move, congratulations.
Not that I agree with the above, just translating.