It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
high rated
avatar
boldee: The usual whining from gamers, I've seen it all before, its the same old something for nothing attitude that is all to prevalent within the gaming community these days.

I bet the majority of people on here complaining about nothing are the same group of gamers who think the free to play option of an MMO entitles them to exactly the same content that subscribers get or they said they would never play an EA game again because they are so bad to their customer base and then Battlefield 4 came out and you just lapped it up.

If you don't like change go and buy your games somewhere else, but you know what the majority of you will whine and complain and threaten to go else where and then do absolutely nothing and continue buying games from GoG I know it and you know it.
The usual generic trite critics from lobotomized sheeps that can't tell the difference between constructive criticism and whining and love to throw their money at people while being buttraped. Really, it's the same old boring argument all over again: "childish...whiny...people always complain...etc.etc.etc.". At least change the disc, the music always sounds the same.
All i see is unsatisfied customers that, mostly politely, explain in detail the reasons why they strongly disagree with those changes. And, unsurprisingly, people who answer them with total disrespect, calling them names and generally acting as douche while accusing them of being whiny. Good way to prove your point and show you are right.
A customer is in every right of expressing his complaints. It's called freedom of speech. You don't like it? Then don't read it. Gosh, if every people was like you Microsoft would be charging people for used games with his new console right now.
And, really, Battlefield 4? You do think that people that register to a website called GOOD OLD GAMES to play point and click adventures and 4X games is the kind of people that play Battlefield 4? XD Hilarious.

P.S. Yeah. I am, indeed, going to buy my games somewhere else. But that won't prevent me from voicing my thoughts on the subject at the same time.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Shendue
Can't see how $55 for AOW3 is the equivalent of EUR 40. This way you err on the greedy side. This way you make sure that you are more expensive than any retailer in this region.

This is not a way to show your new deal partners good sales, you will loose business.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Quantomas
Just a hypothetical question:

IF the people who do not like that GOG.com abandoned one of it's core values vote with their wallet, and IF that is enough to get GOG.com to go back to DRM-free + flat price(But less new games as a result), would the people who are okay with this decision leave GOG.com for other stores were they have all the newest games?
avatar
cmdr_flashheart: Can you also mention, for the record, where you're going to get your DRM-free, flat priced games now?
avatar
Soeverein: Via my girlfriend in the States. Will be moving in a few months anyway. So it won't even affect me personally that much.

But GOG made a promise, and they broke that promise and the trust and good-will they had earned. From that point of view, I even like Steam better than GOG now, at least Steam has always been honest about being c*nts.
Lol, you should have had a girlfriend in Russia because apparently they pay the least, along with some other country I can't remember :] Anyway, while I don't think it's wise to get too hung-up on the promises of businesses, I do try to consider whether something might have had a good reason behind it, and that's why it happened. Whatever, though, cheers.
avatar
StormHammer: " If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. "

Okay guys, we're ready to hear your answers now.

*silence*

Er ... guys?

Hello?!

*room echoes*

<.<
>.>
O.o
Finally someone noticed that it's been 21 hours with absolutely no responce from the staff, apart from the very 4 at the begining of the thread ( http://www.gog.com/forum/general/letter_from_the_md_about_regional_pricing/?staff=yes ).

Are we asking wrong questions, or what?

If you have no answers (as still "nothing's set in stone" as you've said yourselves) communicating this is still better than silence. Sure there are some drama queens around, some 8-10 people threatened to abandon GOG, etc. but majority of people here actually care about GOG, which should mean something to you guys, right?
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Just a hypothetical question:

IF the people who do not like that GOG.com abandoned one of it's core values vote with their wallet, and IF that is enough to get GOG.com to go back to DRM-free + flat price(But less new games as a result), would the people who are okay with this decision leave GOG.com for other stores were they have all the newest games?
It's very hypothetical and I guess not. The same way that the people who are against it now are still here. The best we can hope is a port mortem at some point in the far future when GOG may not be anymore where someone says how it really was. Fortunately this won't happen soon.
high rated
@oneworldoneprice

Well done, sir. I could not have expressed it better.

Also: GOG made their videos about regional pricing private ? This is beyond silly.
avatar
cmdr_flashheart: If that happens, then I don't see DRM-free gaming lasting anywhere. I would be worried at that point.
To be fair*, if it's a case of complying to national/ local laws then it's understandable, otherwise they'd be breaking the law and that could get pretty ugly pretty fast. But that has always the potential to be lifted if/ when legislation changes.

When it comes to publisher/ developer demands - IMHO, when you introduce regional pricing there's almost always that one pub/ dev that would demand the system to be enforced effectively and absolutely. Region locking is one such way. And yes, it is DRM and it's bad, that's why I asked for clarification on the baggages that come with regional pricing.

* hm, I probably shouldn't have used "fair", it's being thrown around too much lately ;-P
avatar
Lilim: ...Are we asking wrong questions, or what? ...
I guess they would say that they explained already everything that they can and want to explain. Although the gifting question is a valid one, if you ask me.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Just a hypothetical question:

IF the people who do not like that GOG.com abandoned one of it's core values vote with their wallet, and IF that is enough to get GOG.com to go back to DRM-free + flat price(But less new games as a result), would the people who are okay with this decision leave GOG.com for other stores were they have all the newest games?
avatar
Trilarion: It's very hypothetical and I guess not. The same way that the people who are against it now are still here. The best we can hope is a port mortem at some point in the far future when GOG may not be anymore where someone says how it really was. Fortunately this won't happen soon.
Thanks for the answer.

I would assume most people would stay if they reversed their decision.
low rated
avatar
boldee: The usual whining from gamers, I've seen it all before, its the same old something for nothing attitude that is all to prevalent within the gaming community these days.

I bet the majority of people on here complaining about nothing are the same group of gamers who think the free to play option of an MMO entitles them to exactly the same content that subscribers get or they said they would never play an EA game again because they are so bad to their customer base and then Battlefield 4 came out and you just lapped it up.

If you don't like change go and buy your games somewhere else, but you know what the majority of you will whine and complain and threaten to go else where and then do absolutely nothing and continue buying games from GoG I know it and you know it.
avatar
Shendue: The usual generic trite critics from lobotomized sheeps that can't tell the difference between constructive criticism and whining and love to throw their money at people while being buttraped. Really, it's the same old boring argument all over again: "childish...whiny...people always complain...etc.etc.etc.". At least change the disc, the music always sounds the same.
A customer is in every right of expressing his complaints. It's called freedom of speech. You don't like it? Then don't read it. Gosh, if every people was like you Microsoft would be charging people for used games with his new console right now.
And, really, Battlefield 4? You do think that people that register to a website called GOOD OLD GAMES to play point and click adventures and 4X games is the kind of people that play Battlefield 4? XD Hilarious.

P.S. Yeah. I am, indeed, going to buy my games somewhere else. But that won't prevent me from voicing my thoughts on the subject at the same time.
The truth hurts I see, So by doing the same as you and expressing my point of view which obviously is not the same as yours I am a lobotomized sheep, that is completely out of order and uncalled for.

I am exercising my right to free speech that there a lot of people on here complaining for the sake of complaining.

Are you serious! People who register with GoG don't play Battlefield 4 lol you really have no idea what you are talking about.
low rated
avatar
Soeverein: Thanks for writing that post. And goodbye. I've downloaded all my GOG installers to HD. Don't plan on coming back after this announcement.

Just went back into my mail archive and found this:

29/05/2009
Welcome to GOG.com

Too bad I won't be around anymore for my 5th anniversary on the site.
What??!! Why??! All this over 3 fucking games. What a bunch of melodramatic bull shit.
Attachments:
avatar
Darkalex6: @oneworldoneprice

Well done, sir. I could not have expressed it better.

Also: GOG made their videos about regional pricing private ? This is beyond silly.
I can't post links but the video at this youtube URL ending (nRdfYwvGTos) was temporarily made private for a day or two last weekend. GOG realized it was bad publicity for them in the current announcement, but since it's on other youtube channels (DzIYJ15CMbk) it was pointless to hide their tracks and they made it public again.
avatar
Wolfsherz: So, you take a lot of words to tell European Customers that the prices on GOG actually increase.

$9.99 is not €7,49! ==> Should be €7,26
avatar
TheEnigmaticT: You mean to tell me that your currency exchange fees are less than 26 eurocents?
Yes, because in Poland only a small percentage of people has credit cards. I for one pay via Pay Pal so it makes no difference whether I exchange from złoty to dollar or to euro.

Dawajcie tu jakiegoś Polaka, a nie Anglika co nawet nie zna warunków życia w Polsce. Strzeliliście sobie w stopę tym idiotycznym ruchem, gratuluję.
avatar
Ichwillnichtmehr: Just a hypothetical question:

IF the people who do not like that GOG.com abandoned one of it's core values vote with their wallet, and IF that is enough to get GOG.com to go back to DRM-free + flat price(But less new games as a result), would the people who are okay with this decision leave GOG.com for other stores were they have all the newest games?
If those newest games were my primary concern, i wouldn't even care about GOG existing. I can buy those everywhere. In fact, i would buy the retail versions for collecting purposes, preferably.
I registered to GOG to play retrogames and indie games. I don't mind them expanding their selection of games just with indie ones, if that means keeping their fair price policy.