It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hey Goggers;

As many of you know, we announced on last Friday that we are going to introduce regional pricing for 3 new games coming up on GOG.com soon. Looking at the amount of reactions (over 3,500 comments at this very moment), it is obvious that this change is making many of you guys worried. We must have failed to clearly explain why our pricing policy for (some) newer games will change and what this means as a matter of fact for our PC & MAC classic games, which account for over 80% of our catalogue.

To be honest, our announcement was a bit vague simply because our future pricing policy is not 100% set in stone yet and we were just worried to make any promises before it was. You know, GOG.com has been growing quickly (thanks to you!), and the more we grow, the more we are worried to make some of you guys disappointed. This is why we were so (over-)cautious with our announcement.

We should have just been upfront about why we've made these changes and what they mean for us in the future and what we're planning. So let's talk. To be clear: what I'm talking about below is our plan. It's a plan that we believe we can accomplish, but while it's what we want to do with GOG, it may change some before it actually sees the light of day. Please don’t blame me for talking open-heartedly today and telling you about the plans and pricing policy we want to fight for and eventually achieve. The below plans aren't sure. The only guarantee I can give you is that we’ll do our best to fight for gamers while still making sure GOG.com as a whole grows (because well, we still want to be around 50 years from now, you know!). So, enough for the introduction, let’s get things started.

Why does GOG.com need to offer newer games at all?

We've been in business for 5 years now, and we've signed a big percentage of all of the classic content that can be legally untangled. There are still some big companies left we're trying to bring into the GOG.com fold, like LucasArts, Microsoft, Take2 and Bethesda, but what classic titles will we sign in the future once we have those partners on-board? We need to sign newer games or else just fire everyone and keep selling the same limited catalog. Either we bring you “not so old” releases from 2010+ or brand-new AAA titles, because these will become classic games tomorrow. It’s as simple as that.

Also, well, we want to expand beyond just classic games, hence the fact we have been offering you brand-new indie releases for almost 2 years now. Why expanding? Well, obviously, because the more games we sell, the more legitimacy we have on the market and the more likely it is that we can achieve our mission: making all PC & MAC video games 100% DRM-free, whether classic or brand-new titles.

To be straightforward (excuse my French):DRM is shit-- we'll never have any of it. It treats legitimate customers like rubbish and pirates don't have to bother with it. It's bad for gamers, and it's also bad for business and our partners. We want to make it easy and convenient for users to buy and play games; rather than give piracy a try. Happy gamers equals a healthy gaming industry; and this is what we fight for. Anyway, I am sure you well know our opinions about DRM.

To make the world of gaming DRM-free, we need to convince top-tier publishers & developers to give us a try with new games, just like they did with classic games. We need to make more case studies for the gaming industry, just like we successfully did back in 2011 with The Witcher 2. It was our first ever 100% DRM-free AAA day-1 release. GOG.com was the 2nd best-selling digital distribution platform worldwide for this title thanks to you guys, despite having regional prices for it. We need more breakthroughs like this to be able to show all the devs and publishers in our industry that DRM-free digital distribution is actually good for their business and their fans. And when I say breakthroughs, I am talking about really kick-ass games, with a potential metacritic score of 85% or more, AA+ and AAA kind of titles.

And this is exactly why we signed those 3 games we told you about last Friday. We believe those 3 games can be massive hits for hardcore gamers, that they can help us spread the DRM-free model among the industry for newer games and we did our best to convince their rights holders to give GOG.com a try. One of those games, as you see already, is Age of Wonders 3. We're planning more titles even beyond these first 3 soon.

Alright, but why is regional pricing needed for those (only 3 so far!) newer games then?

First of all, you have to be aware of an important fact when it comes to newer games: GOG.com cannot really decide what the prices should be. Top-tier developers and publishers usually have contractual obligations with their retail partners that oblige them to offer the game at the same price digitally and in retail. When they don’t have such contractual obligations, they are still encouraged to do so, or else their games might not get any exposure on the shelves in your favorite shops. This will change over time (as digital sales should overtake retail sales in the near future), but as of today, this is still a problem our industry is facing because retail is a big chunk of revenue and there’s nothing GOG.com can do to change that. We need to charge the recommended retail price for the boxed copies of the games in order for developers (or publishers) to either not get sued or at least get their games visible on shelves. You may recall that our sister company CD Projekt RED got sued for that in the past and we don’t want our partners to suffer from that too.

On top of that, you have to know that there are still many top-tier devs and publishers that are scared about DRM-free gaming. They're half-convinced it will make piracy worse, and flat pricing means that we're also asking them to earn less, too. Earn less, you say? Why is that? Well, when we sell a game in the EU or UK, VAT gets deducted from the price before anyone receives any profit. That means we're asking our partners to try out DRM-free gaming and at the same time also earn 19% - 25% less from us. Other stores, such as Steam, price their games regionally and have pricing that's more equitable to developers and publishers. So flat pricing + DRM-Free is something many devs and publishers simply refuse. Can you blame them? The best argument we can make to convince a publisher or developer to try DRM-Free gaming is that it earns money. Telling them to sacrifice income while they try selling a game with no copy protection is not a way to make that argument.

Getting back to those 3 new upcoming games coming up. The first one is Age of Wonders 3, which you can pre-order right now on GOG.com. The next 2 ones will be Divine Divinity: Original Sin and The Witcher 3. We’re very excited to offer those games DRM-free worldwide and we hope you’ll love them.

Still, we know some countries are really being screwed with regional pricing (Western Europe, UK, Australia) and as mentioned above, we’ll do our very best, for every release of a new game, to convince our partners to offer something special for the gamers living there.

And don’t forget guys: if regional pricing for those few big (as in, “AA+”) new games is a problem for you, you can always wait. In a few months. The game will be discounted on sale, and at 60, 70, or 80% off, the price difference will be minimal indeed. In a few years it will become a classic in its own right, and then we have the possibility to to make it flat-priced anyway (read next!) The choice is always yours. All we are after is to present it to you 100% DRM-free. We are sure you will make the best choice for yourself, and let others enjoy their own freedom to make choices as well.

So, what is going to happen with classic games then?

Classic content accounts for about 80% of our catalog, so yes, this is a super important topic. We've mentioned here above that we can’t control prices for new games, but we do have a lot of influence when it comes to classic games. GOG.com is the store that made this market visible and viable digitally, and we're the ones who established the prices we charge. We believe that we have a good record to argue for fair pricing with our partners.

So let's talk about the pricing for classics that we're shooting for. For $5.99 classics, we would like to make the games 3.49 GBP, 4.49 EUR, 199 RUB, and $6.49 AUD. For $9.99 classics, our targets are 5.99 GBP, 7.49 EUR, 349 RUB, and $10.99 AUD. This is what we’ve got in mind at the moment. We’ll do our best to make that happen, and we think it will. How? Well, we have made our partners quite happy with GOG.com's sales for years - thanks to you guys :). We have created a global, legal, successful digital distribution market of classics for them. This market didn't exist 5 years ago. By (re)making all those games compatible with modern operating systems for MAC and PC, we've made forgotten games profitable again. When it comes to classic games, we can tell them that we know more about this market than anyone. :) Being retrogaming freaks ourselves, we know that 5.99 EUR or GBP is crazy expensive for a classic game (compared to 5.99 USD). We have always argued that classic games only sell well if they have reasonable prices. Unfair regional pricing equals piracy and that’s the last thing anybody wants.

What’s next?

We will do our very best to make all of the above happen. This means three things:

First, we will work to make our industry go DRM-free in the future for both classic and new games (that’s our mission!).

Second, we will fight hard to have an attractive offer for those AA+ new games for our European, British and Australian users, despite regional pricing that we have to stick to.

Third, we will switch to fair local pricing for classic games, as I mentioned above.

TheEnigmaticT earlier mentioned that he would eat his hat if we ever brought DRM to GOG.com. I'm going to go one step further: by the end of this year, I'm making the promise that we will have converted our classic catalog over to fair regional pricing as outlined above. If not, we'll set up a record a video of some horrible public shaming for me, TheEnigmaticT, and w0rma. In fact, you know what? Feel free to make suggestions below for something appropriate (but also safe enough that we won't get the video banned on YouTube) so you feel that we're motivated to get this done quickly. I'll pick one that's scary enough from the comments below and we'll let you know which one we're sticking to.

I hope that this explanation has helped ease your worry a bit and help you keep your faith in GOG.com as a place that's different, awesome, and that always fights for what's best for gamers. If you have any questions, comments or ideas, feel free to address them to us below and TheEnigmaticT and I will answer them to the best of our abilities tomorrow. We hear you loud and clear, so please do continue sharing your feedback with us. At the end of the day GOG.com is your place; without you guys it would just be a website where a few crazy people from Europe talk about old games. :)

I end many of my emails with this, but there's rarely a time to use it more appropriately than here:

“Best DRM-free wishes,

Guillaume Rambourg,
(TheFrenchMonk)
Managing Director -- GOG.com”
avatar
JohnnyDollar: I thought so...
avatar
darthspudius: Please... vote for Nothing!

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/nothing
Hehe, started by the big zombie cat. I'll bet that's going to open a can a worms with others coming along with off the wall requests, or have they already arrived? I haven't looked at that part of the site in a while. I can just imagine...
Too bad it's applied for the entire catalog. I won't be buying new games anyway. I don't want to buy a game and then spend thrice the price for DLCs, I will wait for the final version to come out (in 2-3-4 years) and then I'll probably buy it. By then I hope it won't be priced unfairly anymore, or if it will, I'll just skip the game.
avatar
pds41: Guillaume - I appreciate the honesty of your email and agree that I'd like to see new DRM free games here, so can accept regional pricing on those to start with.

However, I struggle to see why you would want to move to regional pricing for the classics unless you're being forced to. At the moment, pricing is inherently fair to the purchaser - everyone pays the same amount of USD. I'm a Brit and I don't mind paying in USD; indeed I would rather continue paying in USD than having a GBP price based an exchange rate at a fixed point in time.

I don't see how this new pricing scheme for classic games benefits me.
avatar
TheFrenchMonk: Hi pds41,

Regional pricing means that your bank will not charge you extra fees to convert your purchase from USD to GBP i.e. we can guarantee that what you see is what you pay. That's good for you guys in my humble opinion.

On top of that, well, there are lots of European/British/Australian gamers out there who are worried to buy anything in USD on the internet, because their bank account is in a different currency. By having local currencies, we will be able to make them feel safer about GOG and have more retrogaming fans on GOG. Even among my circle of French friends, there are people who constantly tell me "5.99 EUR for a classic game, really?" and I am like "no, it's 5.99 USD, which is 4.something EUR". These are exactly the kind of people we also need to make feel more comfortable about GOG.com.
TheFrenchMonk, well so this should had been included in the letter and also, why not the exact same price but only converted?

Another question, why the pricing is so bad for that pre-order for Age of Wonder 3? Why? It is like saying we are going to be fair but sorry we don't but we would try. I hope you at least see the contradiction and understand why so many people is worried and disappointed.
Wait what?
So they're now going to go back and make the classic games more expensive for Australia too? What the actual fuck did I just read? Yes *currently* it makes no difference given the strength of the AUD to the greenback, but currencies fluctuate... why not just make it the same prices as the USD...? Jesus Christ...
low rated
avatar
blotunga: Too bad it's applied for the entire catalog. I won't be buying new games anyway. I don't want to buy a game and then spend thrice the price for DLCs, I will wait for the final version to come out (in 2-3-4 years) and then I'll probably buy it. By then I hope it won't be priced unfairly anymore, or if it will, I'll just skip the game.
U sound like a broken record. How many times have u something like this already? :P
avatar
darthspudius: Please... vote for Nothing!

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/nothing
avatar
JohnnyDollar: Hehe, started by the big zombie cat. I'll bet that's going to open a can a worms with others coming along with off the wall requests, or have they already arrived? I haven't looked at that part of the site in a while. I can just imagine...
Well the vote was started by but it was my idea damn it... MINE! MY OWN!!! MY PRECIOUS!!! AAARGH!!!
high rated
avatar
duffymoon: Flat pricing is a nice idea. But it doesn't fit in with Gog's strategy for growth.
Strangely the "fit" was great for gog's growth until now.

avatar
groze: I just wanted to state flat prices everywhere aren't fair, either.
While nothing is perfectly fair in this world, for sure flat prices are closer to being fair than the current implementation of regional prices. There's no qustion about it.

avatar
crazy_dave: flat is not fair
Flat is more fair than current implementation of regional. Thats a fact.

avatar
StingingVelvet: I pay more for every game on Steam than people in Eastern Europe and Russia do.
Correct for Russia.
Totally wrong for Eastern Europe, while having 5-7 times lower medium monthly income they are paying exactly the same as Western Europe (1usd=1eur).

So its "nice" that you are paying more than a guy waay poorer than you while you pay less than a guy richer as you.
Way to go sherlock

avatar
StingingVelvet: people who make more should pay more.
If that would be valid then we wouldnt have regional pricing but individual pricing.

avatar
StingingVelvet: Retailers refuse to be undercut by Steam, which if you were a retailer I am sure you would understand.
Oh silly me I believe in the principles of free market and free competition which if they were in effect would effectively wipe out the grossly uncompetitive/monoplistic retail market. I'm still amazed that nobody sees that, price protection, price discrimination and the price fixing scheme only to maintain an otherwise dinosaur retail market which if it were in a free competition enviroment would die almost instantly.
I have an ideea for EU commission/committee/board: Investigate the retail/digital video-gaming market. You'll be terrified of the anti-consumer, anti-freedom, anti-market practices you will find there.

avatar
Niggles: Notice "Fair Pricing" not Flat pricing. 'Fair" could be perceived in any number of ways correct?
Yea man, 40$=55$ could be perceived fair, in a very and deeply sick way.

avatar
StingingVelvet: do you really think they're sitting in their offices rubbing their hands together and menacingly saying "charge those Euros higher, because we CAN! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA."
Its exactly what they're doing, otherwise they wouldnt do it.

avatar
JamesBond007: If the Age of Wonders 3's release price will be higher for Europeans (current pre-order price appears to be lower)
Well, in Poland the price is indeed lower but the rest of the Europe got a price of 40EUR=55USD
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Well GOG, in my book you're now relegated to the same status as all the other game retailers. That means you'll probably only be getting my money during large sales, and even then you'll have to compete fiercely on price, product, and service. Not really much more to say; you've made your decision, and now I've made mine. Good day.
This is exactly how I feel, and this is exactly what'll happen for me.
I only managed to buy 55 or so titles in my time here and was happy to do so. However that stops now.

*edit'
spelling
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Jinxtah
While I am not happy with the current setup of regional pricing, many of the reactions I'm reading do not seem like those of reasoning adults. In particular, there are two things that seem to be constantly overlooked.

1) The main source for unfair pricing is the contractual obligations of publishers to retail sellers. This has nothing to do with GOG, but it does mean that if GOG want to sell newer games, they do have to deal with that problem.

2) GOG's policy has always been "fair pricing" and "value for money" and they continue to strive for both. All of the unusual steps taken by GOG thus far have been in pursuit of these two goals. There is no inconsistency, here.

That being said, if some people want to stop buying games from GOG because they don't like the prices offered, that is certainly their choice. To vilify GOG for providing the option to buy something previously not offered here (new games), however, seems just plain stupid. Sure, it would be nice to buy AOW3 for 10 Euros, but you cannot reasonably expect that price in the game's first month. Personally, I wait until the price on a game drops to my "price point" before buying it. Sometimes that takes five years or more, but that is the cost of saving money. If I want new games at release date, I will have to pay more.

As for those people who will lose the unfair advantage they had over the rest of us with the disappearance of "flat pricing," I understand how you might be disappointed. At the same time, however, the goal is to eventually have "fair pricing" and "value for money" for everyone, and it is difficult to complain about that. If I were in your position, I would simply spend my money wherever I found the best value for it. I would also avoid throwing a tantrum in public as it would make me seem like a spoiled brat.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Khalaq
avatar
Captflake: ...It's kind of fighting windmills, the people I adressed will not care and the more reasonable people may feel offended, though they aren't mistaking. ...
i wonder why one has to fight that fight at all? Complaining about other people complaining, what sense is in there? It's much better to just present an argument (opinion or facts) and thereby making a case. Calling someone something (cry-baby, moron, whatever) can only get emotional responses. What did you expect?
high rated
avatar
TheFrenchMonk: Hi pds41,

Regional pricing means that your bank will not charge you extra fees to convert your purchase from USD to GBP i.e. we can guarantee that what you see is what you pay. That's good for you guys in my humble opinion.

On top of that, well, there are lots of European/British/Australian gamers out there who are worried to buy anything in USD on the internet, because their bank account is in a different currency. By having local currencies, we will be able to make them feel safer about GOG and have more retrogaming fans on GOG. Even among my circle of French friends, there are people who constantly tell me "5.99 EUR for a classic game, really?" and I am like "no, it's 5.99 USD, which is 4.something EUR". These are exactly the kind of people we also need to make feel more comfortable about GOG.com.
Regional pricing is a bunch of bullshit. I don't use Euro or British Pounds, or Dollars for that matter. My bank converts no matter what, but now I'm forced to pay more through your "fair regional pricing".
And get it through your head that 5.99 does not equal 4.49 euro no matter how much you claim that it does. Don't think you can fool us with that nonsense. Currency converting is not some big secret, and is easily done by consumers, so there goes your "oh we're doing this for you" argument.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Jinxtah
So I am from India. Pretty sure no one except Steam supports my currency (that too through pre-paid cards). In what region/currency will I be lumped as ? I can't certainly afford GBP or Euro with the current exchange rates. To top it, games are usually not cheaper than Steam over here. When confronted with all of this, I might have to go easy on my no-DRM stance as well.

You compromise, I compromise. I won't be buying from GOG if this regional pricing comes into effect. Plain and simple. Its been great being with you guys through past 2 years or so. But looks like we'll have to part ways now due to some points we no longer see face to face on.
avatar
Niggles: U sound like a broken record. How many times have u something like this already? :P
I am broken inside :P. I feel cheated :)
As said before, for the moment i'm going to keep the faith.But it is safe to say that these are the days GOG lost its innocence.
avatar
darthspudius: Please... vote for Nothing!

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/nothing
avatar
JohnnyDollar: Hehe, started by the big zombie cat. I'll bet that's going to open a can a worms with others coming along with off the wall requests, or have they already arrived? I haven't looked at that part of the site in a while. I can just imagine...
Quite a few requests for GOG.com to re-add their principles to the catalogue.