Posted April 19, 2012
I kind of liked that aspect of it, but if there had been only one AC game, then it would have been a particularly poor choice. The framing device there gives structure to the series and context. I think the games wouldn't have been as good as you wouldn't have a particularly plausible reason for going to all these various places.
EDIT: It also serves as a way of giving the player exposition information that would be tough otherwise. I think games in general don't give that enough attention.
Personally, I'm looking forward to playing the next two games, I'm unable to play any of the ones after Brotherhood on account of being without my gaming rig and PS3.
As far as the suit goes, it's almost certainly without merit. Unless he can prove that Ubisoft had looked at his book there's not enough to justify a suit. It's at least as likely that it's just coincidental.
EDIT: It also serves as a way of giving the player exposition information that would be tough otherwise. I think games in general don't give that enough attention.
Personally, I'm looking forward to playing the next two games, I'm unable to play any of the ones after Brotherhood on account of being without my gaming rig and PS3.
As far as the suit goes, it's almost certainly without merit. Unless he can prove that Ubisoft had looked at his book there's not enough to justify a suit. It's at least as likely that it's just coincidental.
Post edited April 19, 2012 by hedwards