GameRager: It is hateful speech(or included in the list of stuff currently found to be hateful speech to one group or another which PC groups like to point to for reference), but it isn't "terrorism" until they ACT on it, and only those doing such things have committed "terrorism"...not the whole group.
cjrgreen: Well the last time a group calling themselves Ku Klux Klan perpetrated an
act of terrorism was 2006, and it was not condemned by any other group calling themselves Ku Klux Klan, so any claim that the organization has in any way renounced violence is false on its face.
Technically, the Klan is a minimally effective terrorist organization which was largely disbanded following the crack downs in the 90s. There's a few supporters left, but most of them moved on to other organizations.
But, that had more to do with the degree to which the name had become untenable to potential recruits.
hedwards: It's not my definition, that's what terrorism is. Besides, your point doesn't follow anyways.
GameRager: Under the definition you use those are still terrorist acts, for profit or no, racially motivated or no.
Reread my posts, I said no such thing.
