You're only a slacker if you're poor. Upper-class slackers are called "the idle rich."

Yes, we should NEVER let anyone near kids that have had sex, including their PARENTS! OMG.

MEanwhile, anyone that rose to fame on violence is A-ok, let the kids look to them as idols.

While I think they could find more positive role models for kids thre are still two sides to things. If it's not generic pop stars that show skin or reality tv stars that had a sex tape leak it's something else.

Ahhh... A very valid point :-)

Who cares about kids anyway. Let them eat cake.

Ok

If that new princess chick in England has sex on tape the UK will be the most popular kingdom EVAR!

"Hmmm... AVG flagged it as a virus, but... she's so hot! Gotta open it anyway! Oh yeah!"

...

"FUCK!"

So someone can't be on a kid's award show cause said person had sex on tape, really?
fun fact. People have sex quite a bit in life, I'm sure everyone there besides the kids have done it although she might be the only one to have done it on film. Pornstar's; amateur or professional is allowed to care about kids too.

Just to be clear... No one participating in Nickelodeon's Kid's Choice Awards is doing so because they "care" about kids. This, like any awards event, is about selling things. :-)

There's certainly an argument to be made that anyone dealing with kids directly needs to be a decent role model, and she is not. That said neither are most of the people I have heard about being on that show.

What does caring about kids have to do with anything? This isn't Race For The Cure. This isn't a program to stop child abuse. This is a show where Nickelodeon sells breakfast cereal and toys and crap to kids by giving BS awards to assorted celebrities.

I'm sure all the celebrities care about kids in the grand scheme of things... but my amazingly obvious and impossible to not understand point is that this venue is about marketing to kids, not caring about kids.