SimonG: I haven't played NWN 2 yet, but from what I heard it's supposed to be very good.
My favourite reviewer
praised it, the expansion even more.
Leroux: It's definitely not a bad game and he seems to be very passionate about it but I suspect that gets a bit in the way of a balanced review. While I don't necessarily disagree with all the good things he wrote, NWN2 has more downsides than being "too traditional" (e.g. common complaints are the camera control, the miniature inventory, the issues some users have to get it running smoothly on their rig, and I wouldn't call long loading times, slow-downs and bad party AI "minor issues"). The review is written quite well and you might like the game despite all. I'm just saying read a few other reviews by less impressed players, too. ;)
Actually, I usually don't read reviews for opinions, more for the "technical information/features" of a game. His are some of the few ones I really care about. I'm very robust when it comes to design flaws, I loved games others have hated. And he has a 95% hit ratio when it comes to games. Several games I tried only because of his praise (Alpha Protocoll, eg.). I haven't played NWN 2, it is sitting on my GG shelf, so I can't really say if this might be the game were he and I disagree.
You could say that I don't care if a game is good or bad, I care that I like it :-). And often enough, I like what he likes.