This is off-topic, but:
Wishbone: I respectfully disagree. Settlers II was the best. Which is also why that is the one they eventually did a remake of. But again, it's opinion.
I do believe that the choice to remake the second one instead of the first one was a mistake. To me, the original is a much more pure experience. It's almost perfect. I believe The Settlers 2 adds complexity that's not needed, which bogs down the gameplay.
This isn't to say The Settlers 2 is bad. But for me, it feels like most of the stuff that's good about it has been lifted directly from the original, and very few of the extra features and complexity actually make the game better.
Some of the new ideas are very good, but implemented in a flawed manner that's actually detrimental to the overall experience. Like the ships (which had a very random behavior in the original S2) and the catapults (which are overpowered, IMO).
The donkeys were a good idea too, but they (and the new multiple carrier system) made proper road planning much less important. To counter this, the devs came up with the incredibly annoying idea that trees should block the roads.
(it's perhaps also worth noting that I prefer the Amiga version of the original Settlers over the PC-version).
Edit: Darned quoting-system...