blakstar: I didn't mind multiplayer at one point, but it seems as if it's got to the point where games just have to include social and multiplayer aspects at the cost of single player -- for example, Mass Effect 3. It started as a single player game, continued into 2 as a single player game, and then shoehorned multiplayer into 3.
Granted, some players may like that, but I would have preferred that they finished it as they started, and used resources to properly test and finish the story in a way that wouldn't have caused so much backlash.
I know that's an old example now, but developers have to realise that some people still want a single player experience from time to time, especially in a story that they may have invested a fair amount of time in.
Oh... Just thought of another example, why oh why, couldn't they just have given us a proper Knights of the Old Republic 3, instead of the mess that eventually emerged? Sorry if this is a little long, I didn't mean to turn this into some kind of diatribe, but my thought processes kind of ran away from me. :-)
Because some kid back in G4's X-Play ask Adam and Morgan saying "Will there be a KOTOR MMO?"
StingingVelvet: I don't like them either.
What I suggest is to either largely solo some MMOs, interacting with people only when you want to, or
play some Battlefield, which is the most singleplayer-like online shooter in my experience.