amok: ...And that is off course only personal views. For me it is more important that the persons who do make something also gets the bigger cut, be it by 1% or by 90%, the size of the cut do not matter. ...
I can understand that. You are acting on principles. I just want to express my opinion that most people probably make a difference if the cut is large or small. It means that the size of the cut for most people matters too.
But as I said there is more than just the cut. Service matters too. Or GOG could lower their cuts. And finally I could say that the middlemen also makes something, so they have earned a reasonable cut. But what is a reasonable cut? Highly debatable topic.
What if a game from Humble Store for Linux doesn't really work well on many Linuxes because Humble Store never checked that? That would be bad. I would rather pay a higher cut to someone who actually checks that before.
Let's wait and see how this develops. Maybe Humble Store might have some unique advantages over GOG by offering Linux compatibility and lower cuts (although 5% isn't that much) and if they otherwise match GOG (price wise, service wise, DRM wise) then I could imagine they get more famous than GOG in the end. But maybe GOG adds Linux compatibility and lowers the cuts and offers better prices or better service or more DRM free games, then GOG will probably stay ahead.
With every new competitor it's an open race.
Fictionvision: I saw people elsewhere complaining that EA was trying to buy good will and popularity from the Origin bundle. Considering UPlay gets more hate than Origin I can see people giving it a good amount of hate.
KneeTheCap: So even when you get great games dirt cheap, some still complain? I don't understand...
I also don't understand that. I generally do not follow bundles but I remember having heard of this one and I thought, well at least for a little bit they are doing it right. What happened to "give credit where credit is due".