Then again, it's a commercial enterprise that doesn't make a habit of screwing over its customers, whicn in this industry is something that is badly needed. We move within a commercial segment where ethics are a rare thing indeed (EA, Activision/Blizzard, Valve, Microsoft) and any company that is willing to put its foot down to at least give gamers what they want deserves the benefit of the doubt.

I know Humble Bundle has been known to slip up from time to time (the THQ debacle, the issue with the Linux verison of Limbo, the Botanicula issue) but on the whole this, along with GOG and CDPR, is a company that I personally would much rather have holding a larger market share in PC gaming than a company like Valve or EA. And if I'm honest, if they make a crapload of money from actually providing a better service (as opposed to simply marketing it better), I don't begrudge them that.

And bear in mind too that developers get a larger share from the Humble Store than from other platforms (not necessarily the Humble Bundles mind you, as this is within the power of the buyer).

I'm aware of the Alexander Zubov/Steel Storm situation, and honestly I'm reluctant to put too much stock into what he says, given that the bundle income had to be split up between seven developers, the charities, Humble Bundle and various payment processing expenses. Assuming the default split (65% to developers, 20% to charity, 15% to Humble Bundle), that would mean around $180,000 less payment processing fees (which may possibly be substantial), which is indeed a "tiny, tiny fraction", but is also fair.