It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Strijkbout: If the computer is really that old I suggest to install MS-DOS.

=D
Can someone take a downloaded GOG game, and remove
the guts, and play it in regular DOS, or are the files dependent
on DOSBOX?
avatar
Strijkbout: If the computer is really that old I suggest to install MS-DOS.

=D
avatar
GlassAgate: Can someone take a downloaded GOG game, and remove
the guts, and play it in regular DOS, or are the files dependent
on DOSBOX?
There is no specific "DOSBox dependency". Games that run on DOSBox can, by definition, be made running on regular DOS as well. You have to provide the right environment for the game of course (something that DOSBox and GOG's configuration file ought to do for you otherwise)..
avatar
StingingVelvet: 99% of things I want to play seem to work fine, either through Dosbox or with custom mods and installers people have made (like for Blade Runner).

For the rare game that refuses to work on modern systems, like Indiana Jones and the Infernal Machine, I will wait for a solid WinBox.
Same here.
avatar
yyahoo: No offense intended, but it's not my belief that a 1.3 ghz *Celeron* was *ever* a component of a "modern" system. Same thing for the MX440. The Geforce 4 MX line was not a true Geforce 4 card. Heck, it wasn't even as powerful as a Geforce 3. It was essentially a Geforce 2 with higher bandwidth.

GOG's use of NewDark on Thief 2 was already mentioned, but I think a big problem is that the system really isn't that hot in the first place. Celeron's were never very good processor's, particularly back then, and the Geforce 4 MX line was a marketing rip-off.
avatar
Sips: Compared games like Darkstone, Red Baron3d, Thief 2 and some else my rig is not only modern but sci-fi - it didn't existed on time those games came out. They were meant to run on MUCH worse systems.

You are NOT logical!
I think he's actually perfectly logical and made a valid comment.

I do have difficulties understanding _your_ logic though.

I have a netbook with an Intel Atom processor. This CPU wasn't designed when lots of the games in GOG's catalog were originally released. Hence, this processor is "Sci-Fi" by your definition and should run these games? That doesn't make sense. No matter when exactly a CPU was designed, you have to take into account the usage scenario it was meant for. Intel Celeron processors were always meant to be low-cost, low-performance - and the GeForce 4 MX 440 was _especially_ low performance, in fact its very name is borderline false advertising.

For DOS games, follow the advice already given - play the games in native DOS. For Windows games, contrary to your expectation, there is no emulation layer in effect that could be turned off (with a handful of exceptions, like Thief, which received an engine update). Your current machine is simply much weaker than you apparently expect it to be.

Edit: That said, you are correct in stating that the system requirements for many GOG titles are higher than they were for the originals. You can check the original requirements on mobygames, and they are indeed much lower than your current system.
Post edited June 30, 2013 by Psyringe
avatar
Sips: Compared games like Darkstone, Red Baron3d, Thief 2 and some else my rig is not only modern but sci-fi - it didn't existed on time those games came out. They were meant to run on MUCH worse systems.

You are NOT logical!
avatar
Psyringe: I think he's actually perfectly logical and made a valid comment.

I do have difficulties understanding _your_ logic though.

I have a netbook with an Intel Atom processor. This CPU wasn't designed when lots of the games in GOG's catalog were originally released. Hence, this processor is "Sci-Fi" by your definition and should run these games? That doesn't make sense. No matter when exactly a CPU was designed, you have to take into account the usage scenario it was meant for. Intel Celeron processors were always meant to be low-cost, low-performance - and the GeForce 4 MX 440 was _especially_ low performance, in fact its very name is borderline false advertising.

For DOS games, follow the advice already given - play the games in native DOS. For Windows games, contrary to your expectation, there is no emulation layer in effect that could be turned off (with a handful of exceptions, like Thief, which received an engine update). Your current machine is simply much weaker than you apparently expect it to be.

Edit: That said, you are correct in stating that the system requirements for many GOG titles are higher than they were for the originals. You can check the original requirements on mobygames, and they are indeed much lower than your current system.
"You have to take into account the usage scenario it was meant for"

Original games fits perfectly into this usage scenario, several are tested ten or more years ago. Why GOG ones doesn't? GOG games "Good old games for good modern rig". This is silly.

I don't get YOUR point here, are you REALLY trying to say that old games are not meant to run well machines of same era, or on better rigs...?

"Your current machine is simply much weaker than you apparently expect it to be"

Wrong! I know how weak it is and i select games according it weaknesses.

"That said, you are correct in stating that the system requirements for many GOG titles are higher than they were for the originals. You can check the original requirements on mobygames, and they are indeed much lower than your current system."

Thank you, at least this one made some sense...

"GOG titles are higher than they were for the originals."

GROSSLY higher:

Darkstone 1999:

System required:
CPU Type: Pentium
CPU Speed in MHz: 233MHz
RAM: 32MB
Hard Drive Space: 170MB
CD Drive Speed: 8X
Video Card: 3D AGP
Color Depth: 16-bit
Compatible Devices:
Software (DirectX 5.0, etc.): DirectX 7

Darkstone GoG:

MINIMUM system requirements:

1.8 GHz Processor, 512MB RAM (1 GB recommended),
3D graphics card compatible with DirectX 7 (compatible with DirectX 9 recommended),
2GB HDD,
Mouse, Keyboard.

I should avoid GoG, but sadly, originals are no more around..
Post edited June 30, 2013 by Sips
avatar
Sips: snip
Let me put it in a simple manner:

1. GOG makes old games work on newer rigs. This requires emulators(dosbox) and other fixes, that make the game have higher reqs.
2. Many of these game WILL work on your rig.
3.Since you already have an old rig, you can just disable some of these fixes, and play them as they were originally.



In short - buy games whose initial requirements are good for your PC. For those that don't work - just disable the stuff GOG added, and you'll be fine. You can make threads about it here in the General Discussion if you don't know how, and I'm sure somebody will guide you through it.
Yes it's rather flabbergasting how much CPU power emulating some games on DOSBox requires, like some of the 3D games. Especially when you consider the tiny system requirements that they had on native MS-DOS.

Not as bad as PS2 or Gamecube emulation though.
avatar
Crosmando: Yes it's rather flabbergasting how much CPU power emulating some games on DOSBox requires, like some of the 3D games. Especially when you consider the tiny system requirements that they had on native MS-DOS.

Not as bad as PS2 or Gamecube emulation though.
Darkstone is not DOS game. Several GOG ancient games requires a system that can run freaking Doom 3!
avatar
Sips: snip
avatar
Licurg: In short - buy games whose initial requirements are good for your PC. For those that don't work - just disable the stuff GOG added, and you'll be fine.
That would be solution! If there is way to disable it...

PS: All games i mentioned in this thread (Except Doom3 obviously) had original requirements for system well below my rig. And none of them are DOS game.
Post edited June 30, 2013 by Sips
avatar
Sips: Darkstone is not DOS game. Several GOG ancient games requires a system that can run freaking Doom 3!
That would be solution! If there is way to disable it...
Yes, there is... Seriously, it can't be that hard :P
avatar
Sips: I mean ancient games on GOG sauce on ancient computer that on times was modern.

I have, at moment, 1.3 Ghz Celeron with geforce 4 mmx440 to use so i had to seek some ancient games and GOG seemed to be a good choice. Or is it? NO! Come on, 1998 game Darkstone need 1.8 Ghz system to run smoothly, Red Baron 3d needs 1 ghz as minimum and so on.

Why your ancient games are unplayable on machine that was sci-fi on times when those games came out?

PS: I was forced to borrow my bro original Thief 2 CD-s to play this game smoothly because GOG one had terrible frame rate.
I never paid attention to the specs back then but if you're correct and the specs have been raised since GOG resurrected the games then I would think it has to do with overcompensation seeing as these old games were never optimized for recent OS's and configurations but rather ran through an emulator (DOSBox).

This is the same reason as to why you can play modern day games like Skyrim on PC but when running some old and uglier Playstation 2 games through PCSX2 they suck up all your system resources and can often times lock up and crash the PC.

In short, your PC is doing more thinking now then it did then because it has to think outside of it's current setup and then think about how to pretend it is an older OS and hardware.

EDIT:

I guess the best metaphor I can give is

Let's say your a Windows 98 game speaking English and residing in Windows 98 which is the USA
but
you take a trip to Spain/Window XP
Now you have to translate English to Spanish to get anywhere.
You make a good friend in Spain and she travels with you to Japan/Windows 7
Now you have translate English to Spanish and then Spanish to Japanese.

Which is going to slow down the communication process and require meatier hardware if you want to compensate and speed things up a bit.
Post edited June 30, 2013 by carnival73
Doom 3 isn't a good example really, id downsampled a lot of the textures and gutted a lot of stuff in the game to make it run on consoles. The original Doom using brutal doom mod probably uses more system resources than Doom 3.
avatar
Sips: Thank you, at least this one made some sense...

"GOG titles are higher than they were for the originals."

GROSSLY higher:

Darkstone 1999:

System required:
CPU Type: Pentium
CPU Speed in MHz: 233MHz
RAM: 32MB
Hard Drive Space: 170MB
CD Drive Speed: 8X
Video Card: 3D AGP
Color Depth: 16-bit
Compatible Devices:
Software (DirectX 5.0, etc.): DirectX 7

Darkstone GoG:

MINIMUM system requirements:

1.8 GHz Processor, 512MB RAM (1 GB recommended),
3D graphics card compatible with DirectX 7 (compatible with DirectX 9 recommended),
2GB HDD,
Mouse, Keyboard.

I should avoid GoG, but sadly, originals are no more around..
Actually, Darkstone needed a Pentium II (333 Mhz) to work well. I still have the original disk and it will run too fast on most moder computers.

Now, the problem as I see it is twofold.

On one side, Gog probably has to slow down the games to make them usable on modern computers. When dosbox is being used, you will be able to modify the parameters to cope with the relative underperformance of a Celeron.

On the other side, the requirements in Ghz are not that meaningful. We all use different generations of hardware. How does that 2700 Mhz Athlon compare to that 2400 Mhz core i7 ? I run most of my Gog games on a 1600Mhz E-450. Those that don't work have more problems with the graphhic part of the APU than with the clock speed of the CPU.