escapedturkey: Seems a bit unethical to advertise for the competition. Just imo.
About Us section 2:
Weclock: "2. So you’re cheap. It’s okay – we are, too.
For less than the cost of a lunch at some lousy diner you can own some of the greatest games of all time. No matter how big the file is and how successful the game was, you’ll leave the table satisfied that you got a great deal for your money. As an added bonus, our house specialities won’t make you sick."
oddly enough, my firefox spelling plugin calls "specialities" misspelled as written from the GOG.com site..
Anyway, my point is, we're frugal gamers, GOG.com is aware of this, and I'm certain they aren't jealous, and they realize that as smart consumers we're going to go for the best deal, whether that's in immeasurable value like the extras and addons from GOG.com or in price. The products you receive from steam and the products here, are two completely different products in my opinion.
With Steam, you get a game. With GOG.com, you get support for the games you buy, plus growing interest. They secure new additional content frequently for the games you've already purchased, and you don't have to pay any extra for them. GOG.com gives away free games to all it's members. the GOG.com package is infinitely better, but if you notice the two games that I pointed out specifically are not on GOG.com nor do I suspect they will ever be (Bioshock = DRM, Portal = Steam lolkthxbai). These extras are not simply because they feel guilty or anything like that, it's a part of their model. There is after-sales support for all purchased games.
With a steam product, what do you get? you get the built in steam proprietary drm, that tells everyone who subscribes to steam, what you're playing.
So anyway, to close, I don't feel like GOG.com and Steam are competitors, sure they have some of the same games, but they don't have the same products. And with steam, you have a great deal of games that are indie developed, meaning they aren't "good old games." not yet anyway.