It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Havent read rest of the thread but im sure some smartass has mentioned ebook at some point LOL.
Hardback is cool if im really keen on a book and want it quick and the price is 'reasonable'. If im ok to wait, usually wait for the paperback version to come out. Hardbacks are nicer if you want to display on a shelf.....
avatar
hedwards: Indeed, ebooks are clearly the superior book. Both paperback and hardcover tend to be excessively difficult to read and terrible ergonomically.

Probably the only time I've found them to be worthwhile since the invention of ebooks is for some reference books where I need to quickly flip back and forth between pages. In that case, the hard cover is definitely superior as paper backs tend to be more difficult to keep open without holding them.

But really, dead tree editions are horrible and should be discontinued as soon as possible for the betterment of humanity.
avatar
Theta_Sigma: I say MORE dead tree editions, I want a library filled with the skins of their kindred filling the walls from floor to ceiling! Seriously though, as much I love the betterment of technology for creating a cleaner society to our world, books are one thing I think should never be gotten rid of. If the problem is the use of trees, find alternate means of paper, or even recycle books that are damaged to the point they would be thrown out.

Also, there is the unlikely but still possible scenario that they did this then some technological "hiccup" occurs and all those books would be lost. That's really something I don't think humanity can afford to happen. I know this is an unlikely case but it's always best to plan for the worst, hope for the best.

I do own an e-reader, and I do enjoy the lack of weight provided by loading books ON to said device, but personally to me books are history and something truly special. Now a reasonable compromise I think, would be to offer considerable discounts to eBook version of titles and say offer a printed version made available to those interested at an additional cost to have one fabricated.

To me there are far more other things the world needs to find alternatives to rather than ceasing book productions. Such as, alternative fuels, alternative power sources, getting the climate shift issues under control, etc... But, most of this is just my opinion, and that's my 2 cents... :)
Improve our habits one step at a time.

Responsible cutting sounds like a good idea, but in truth, we are cutting swaths of our forest (it's pretty bad in my province where the paper industry is huge, a popular local folk song singer and activist did a documentary about it some years back and it blew up a storm for a while).

Wood cutting companies will cut corners with the silent complicity of our government. They'll use tricks like cutting large swaths of forests and leaving maybe a kilometer's worth bordering the roads to keep the public in the dark about things.

For storage, it's unlikely that all stored copies around the world would vanish.

In many ways, they are longer lived than discontinued paper copies (copying a paper book takes time and effort... copying a DRM-free electronic book...).

E-readers are the future. They just need a gigantic push in the ass to realize their potential (more diverse e-readers for various needs, more DRM-free books, passing some of the savings from not having a paper book to the customer).
Post edited November 03, 2012 by Magnitus
avatar
teshra: Paperback, cheaper and takes up less space.
avatar
silvers24: Yes, I agree. Paperbacks are also lighter to carry.

I still either favor paperback or hardback over digital books, though. I like the whole experience of reading: smelling the paper, opening the book, flipping the pages, feeling the texture of the paper. It is not just an information source for me.

I appreciate the convenience of e-books, especially old, digitized out-of-print books that I've needed for research. I would have appreciated an e-reader in college, especially for reference books. My main complaint is that new e-books are only about a dollar less than the printed version. I understand it from a publisher's POV, but that is no incentive for me to buy it (yes, I'm saving trees, I know). I don't expect digital versions to be free, but certainly less than a printed book.

My true preference, really, is whatever copy I can borrow for free from my public library. Sometimes that is a digital copy, but generally not.

ETA: Theta_Sigma expressed many of my thoughts, just before I posted. I agree with the additional points mentioned.
Thank you for the kind words, it is still nice to see others who share my love of the "feel" given by a real book in your lap, and finger tips. Digital is nice, but will never have that same experience provided by a print title.
avatar
silvers24: Yes, I agree. Paperbacks are also lighter to carry.

I still either favor paperback or hardback over digital books, though. I like the whole experience of reading: smelling the paper, opening the book, flipping the pages, feeling the texture of the paper. It is not just an information source for me.

I appreciate the convenience of e-books, especially old, digitized out-of-print books that I've needed for research. I would have appreciated an e-reader in college, especially for reference books. My main complaint is that new e-books are only about a dollar less than the printed version. I understand it from a publisher's POV, but that is no incentive for me to buy it (yes, I'm saving trees, I know). I don't expect digital versions to be free, but certainly less than a printed book.

My true preference, really, is whatever copy I can borrow for free from my public library. Sometimes that is a digital copy, but generally not.

ETA: Theta_Sigma expressed many of my thoughts, just before I posted. I agree with the additional points mentioned.
avatar
Theta_Sigma: Thank you for the kind words, it is still nice to see others who share my love of the "feel" given by a real book in your lap, and finger tips. Digital is nice, but will never have that same experience provided by a print title.
If it's all the same, I prefer the 'feel' of our northern forests not being cut down.

They are not even cutting it for housing or farming or something semi-justifiable like that.

They are cutting it down for paper in the height of the electronic age!
Post edited November 03, 2012 by Magnitus
ebooks provide the superior book experience. There are a few exceptions: non-fiction work with a lot of footnotes; even if it's well-formatted, with hypertext links, it's obviously less convenient to have to click things than to be able to just glance at the bottom of the page. Books with a lot of illustrations. Books with special formatting, like House of Leaves. But at this point, a book has to be pretty special for me to want to buy a physical copy.
avatar
Magnitus: Improve our habits one step at a time.

Responsible cutting sounds like a good idea, but in truth, we are cutting swaths of our forest (it's pretty bad in my province where the paper industry is huge, a popular local folk song singer and activist did a documentary about it some years back and it blew up a storm for a while).

Wood cutting companies will cut corners with the silent complicity of our government. They'll use tricks like cutting large swaths of forests and leaving maybe a kilometer's worth bordering the roads to keep the public in the dark about things.

For storage, it's unlikely that all stored copies around the world would vanish.

In many ways, they are longer lived than discontinued paper copies (copying a paper book takes time and effort... copying a DRM-free electronic book...).

E-readers are the future. They just need a gigantic push in the ass to realize their potential (more diverse e-readers for various needs, more DRM-free books, passing some of the savings from not having a paper book to the customer).
Same goes for the US, most of the national forest has been logged. And the logging firms only had to provide roads to get to those areas in exchange for the rights to log. Roads which they would have to put in to get the trees out anyways... Which is to say they were given the timber for free and the citizens got the shaft.

Weyerhauser does however have millions of acres of farms where they grow wood for such uses. Unfortunately, those forests are effectively dead as they don't have any of the normal undergrowth.

Paper is definitely superior for the purposes of archiving for a possibly nuclear holocause, but there's no reason why we need to print so many books for that purpose. And with funding things like the national archives, Library of Congress and such could do that even more efficiently with just stacks of printed pages, which could more efficiently be duplicated if need be.
avatar
Theta_Sigma: I say MORE dead tree editions, I want a library filled with the skins of their kindred filling the walls from floor to ceiling! Seriously though, as much I love the betterment of technology for creating a cleaner society to our world, books are one thing I think should never be gotten rid of. If the problem is the use of trees, find alternate means of paper, or even recycle books that are damaged to the point they would be thrown out.

Also, there is the unlikely but still possible scenario that they did this then some technological "hiccup" occurs and all those books would be lost. That's really something I don't think humanity can afford to happen. I know this is an unlikely case but it's always best to plan for the worst, hope for the best.

I do own an e-reader, and I do enjoy the lack of weight provided by loading books ON to said device, but personally to me books are history and something truly special. Now a reasonable compromise I think, would be to offer considerable discounts to eBook version of titles and say offer a printed version made available to those interested at an additional cost to have one fabricated.

To me there are far more other things the world needs to find alternatives to rather than ceasing book productions. Such as, alternative fuels, alternative power sources, getting the climate shift issues under control, etc... But, most of this is just my opinion, and that's my 2 cents... :)
avatar
Magnitus: Improve our habits one step at a time.

Responsible cutting sounds like a good idea, but in truth, we are cutting swaths of our forest (it's pretty bad in my province where the paper industry is huge, a popular local folk song singer and activist did a documentary about it some years back and it blew up a storm for a while).

Wood cutting companies will cut corners with the silent complicity of our government. They'll use tricks like cutting large swaths of forests and leaving maybe a kilometer's worth bordering the roads to keep the public in the dark about things.

For storage, it's unlikely that all stored copies around the world would vanish.

In many ways, they are longer lived than discontinued paper copies (copying a paper book takes time and effort... copying a DRM-free electronic book...).

E-readers are the future. They just need a gigantic push in the ass to realize their potential (more diverse e-readers for various needs, more DRM-free books, passing some of the savings from not having a paper book to the customer).
Yes and no, keep in mind pulp and paper goods are not limited to books, but toilet paper, news papers, printer paper, fliers, etc... Now with the exception of TP (and I will attack anyone like a rabid squirrel if they try take away my toilet paper) all of those can be converted to digital variations rather successfully. I was specifically referring to texts that aren't disposed of right off the bat such as Novels, Graphic novels, Comics, Manga, Scientific Texts, and some Reference materials. Which I think should never cease to be printed.

I realize the politics of business are not a pretty matter, and by the reference to "my province" I take it you're a BC resident. I also suggested recycling the paper from fliers, news papers and the like to cut down upon logging companies.

I said it's unlikely as well, but the fact it remains a possibility is enough of a reason to not remove printed books from circulation/being made. An example of why I make a statement is, I am a HUGE classic Doctor Who fan, and many early episodes were lost due to wiping of tapes. Now that is intentional, but it's the fact recorded mediums are easily lost or destroyed and the original product is gone for good. NEVER trust recording mediums as the only source of storage for any important information.

Yes, but by converting everything over to all digital you take away many jobs from book store owners, to people working in printing plants, to others who depend on printed books for a living. Saying "eliminate" them is all well and good but you in the long run also take away many people's livelihood. Heck, you could also seriously effect something like the convention scene for books, comics, etc.... As well meaning as that is, the ends don't always justify the means.

I realize you said baby steps, but no matter how many baby steps you take you could have a lot of unexpected consequences as well. I don't think E-readers are the future so much as a viable alternative and part of the future of the written word. I, personally, have the opinion that both print AND digital mediums should be available to those in terms of novels and other reading materials that will not be immediately disposed of, and magazines, newspapers, fliers, etc...strictly digital or 100% recycled only.

That being said, you are entitled to your opinion, and I respect that. This is simply my (albeit a little idealistic) view. :)
avatar
Theta_Sigma: I realize you said baby steps, but no matter how many baby steps you take you could have a lot of unexpected consequences as well. I don't think E-readers are the future so much as a viable alternative and part of the future of the written word. I, personally, have the opinion that both print AND digital mediums should be available to those in terms of novels and other reading materials that will not be immediately disposed of, and magazines, newspapers, fliers, etc...strictly digital or 100% recycled only.

That being said, you are entitled to your opinion, and I respect that. This is simply my (albeit a little idealistic) view. :)
+1.I like this view. Im uneasy as well about how many think digital is the way to go.Sure for convenience perhaps, however one other point is, not everyone has access to a e-reader, or a basic pc or access to basic internet even (ie lot of africa and third world countries).Having ebooks is a good ALTERNATIVE.Not as a replacement for real books. :)
avatar
Theta_Sigma: Thank you for the kind words, it is still nice to see others who share my love of the "feel" given by a real book in your lap, and finger tips. Digital is nice, but will never have that same experience provided by a print title.
avatar
Magnitus: If it's all the same, I prefer the 'feel' of our northern forests not being cut down.

They are not even cutting it for housing or farming or something semi-justifiable like that.

They are cutting it down for paper in the height of the electronic age!
Hmm, let's look at it this way, all the plastics in most electronics require oil to produce, now the refining process can pollute air, water, and other resources. Of that most electronics fail (as opposed to hundreds of year old books in readable condition), of those that fail many end up in landfills as opposed to being repaired. And can arguably be worse on the environment.

Look this debate is really just coming down to splitting hairs, it's really going nowhere and will likely result in degenerating into an argument. So let's just agree to disagree and move on...sound fair?
avatar
Theta_Sigma: I realize you said baby steps, but no matter how many baby steps you take you could have a lot of unexpected consequences as well. I don't think E-readers are the future so much as a viable alternative and part of the future of the written word. I, personally, have the opinion that both print AND digital mediums should be available to those in terms of novels and other reading materials that will not be immediately disposed of, and magazines, newspapers, fliers, etc...strictly digital or 100% recycled only.

That being said, you are entitled to your opinion, and I respect that. This is simply my (albeit a little idealistic) view. :)
avatar
nijuu: +1.I like this view. Im uneasy as well about how many think digital is the way to go.Sure for convenience perhaps, however one other point is, not everyone has access to a e-reader, or a basic pc or access to basic internet even (ie lot of africa and third world countries).Having ebooks is a good ALTERNATIVE.Not as a replacement for real books. :)
I agree with you, I actually overlooked the fact that such technology in 3rd world nations is also an issue. Thank you for adding another perspective for which me to consider as well. :)
Post edited November 03, 2012 by Theta_Sigma
avatar
Marzooker: I very rarely buy (or read) hardcover novels, but in recent times I've picked up some great hardcover bargains and am currently enjoying the new Nicci French novel, a book I treated myself to on the weekend.

There are things I love about hardcover books, and things I hate. They're luxurious to hold, with thicker paper and smooth, sometimes deluxe-to-the-touch dust-jackets, but they weigh too much to cart around on the train and they take up too much room on my bookshelves.

Which do you prefer - hardcover or paperback? And why?
Hardcover. They look better and last longer.
avatar
Theta_Sigma: Theta_Sigma: Thank you for the kind words, it is still nice to see others who share my love of the "feel" given by a real book in your lap, and finger tips. Digital is nice, but will never have that same experience provided by a print title.
I totally understand. Every since I was a child, opening a book has been a kind of magical experience -- an escape (in a good way) into another perspective, time or culture. The physicality of the book enhanced that feeling. It sounds silly trying to explain it unless the other person feels similarly. My parents rarely buy books (yay, for libraries), so a fresh, new book was an extra special treat or present when I was growing up.
BadDecissions: But at this point, a book has to be pretty special for me to want to buy a physical copy.
Heh. I'm not mocking you, but I feel the exact same way about e-books! It has to be a super special edition and/or have a feature that really adds to the reading experience for me to buy it. It's funny how people feel the exact opposite about the same topic.
avatar
Theta_Sigma: Theta_Sigma: Thank you for the kind words, it is still nice to see others who share my love of the "feel" given by a real book in your lap, and finger tips. Digital is nice, but will never have that same experience provided by a print title.
avatar
silvers24: I totally understand. Every since I was a child, opening a book has been a kind of magical experience -- an escape (in a good way) into another perspective, time or culture. The physicality of the book enhanced that feeling. It sounds silly trying to explain it unless the other person feels similarly. My parents rarely buy books (yay, for libraries), so a fresh, new book was an extra special treat or present when I was growing up.
BadDecissions: But at this point, a book has to be pretty special for me to want to buy a physical copy.
avatar
silvers24: Heh. I'm not mocking you, but I feel the exact same way about e-books! It has to be a super special edition and/or have a feature that really adds to the reading experience for me to buy it. It's funny how people feel the exact opposite about the same topic.
Awesome, I am the same way. I always wanted to time travel ever since I was a small child. For me, reading was my own way TO time travel, visit different periods, or see new and interesting cultures (even if completely fictional) right from my chair or bed. It doesn't sound silly at all, I feel the same way that books are one thing that can truly enhance the pleasure of reading.

Actually when I was a small child right through till I graduated college, I would sit in libraries by myself and read till I would pass out. I had many issues when I was very little where I had trouble reading and couldn't till I was age 2 and half or so. My first book ever was Frankenstein (and even at that age it bugged me when people called the monster Frankenstein LOL). When I was in hospital I would sneak that and The Hobbit to read (due to being in isolation they didn't want me bringing in too much).

I still own that copy of Frankenstein around here, it was so cool the cover had this patchwork of different face bits all meshed together to make the monster's face. It was so amazing...but also so, so sad. It made the story that much more heart breaking.
Paperback for use, hardback for switches to enter my underground lair.
avatar
Dzsono: Paperback for use, hardback for switches to enter my underground lair.
Funny, I just use weighted torches. Twist them the wrong way and they set off booby traps. But that's just my method. :)
I prefer paperbacks because as a few others have said, hardcovers can be unwieldy.
I know digital books are the future, but I still buy physical books. I have a weird fetish for walls lined with packed bookshelves in my house. They give the illusion that I am fancy and sophisticated
Post edited November 04, 2012 by CaptainGyro