GameRager: If it's a copy of your data then how is it not a backup(technically speaking), or at the very least the makings of one if need be?
xyem: It's a backup in case of physical drive failure, it is not a backup for the many other things that cause data loss. Everything the originals are subject to, the "RAID copy" is subject to as well. Accidental deletions? Copied instantly. Malware introduced? Copied instantly. Malevolent intrusion? Copied instantly. Even the drive containing the originals failing can cause the drive failure of the copy, as the second disk can fail under the strain of rebuilding (which is one reason why you are not supposed to use similar disks).
Yes indeed, most data loss is not from hardware failure or miscopies, it's from plain old user error. Fatfinger the wrong files and you end up with nothing on either disk to save you.
Personally, I like to use ZFS or something similar as it actually monitors and repairs files warning you if it can't verify the file against the checksum. RAID arrays will happily allow bit rot to ensue without any warning at all.
GameRager: I use mine to store additional data, thus allowing me to have more on the same system. I only make backups of important data, not every single thing on the system.
xyem: RAID0 would also allow you to have more on the same system (and make read operations faster too) but the failure of either drive would render all data inaccessible. Fun fun!
I have RAID1 on my three main machines (2 desktops and server) only to stop a drive failure taking the machine offline. My backups are similar to yours as they are not full disk images, but do contain everything important.
Heh, there's a reason why they call that RAID "0" and this is it. Personally, I use Crashplan and generally have a back up on site and at least one offsite. Makes situations like this a lot less scary. The big issue though tends to be after the restore having to work to figure out what files I really need and which ones are duplicates. Fortunately, I'm usually only restoring a few files or a directory.
GameRager: Still, if it is malware related and the MWB has become infected this is the best course of action. Ultimately it's up to him to decide.
xyem: The problem being that he doesn't know if it is malware related and every write to the disk could be causing him to lose more and more data. When your data is at risk, you always go from the most conservative options first..
I'd do the disk imaging just because there's definitely a possibility that something has gone awry with the MFT in which case you could indeed very quickly lose all of the files instead of just a few.
If the OP uses file recovery software, it should work on images rather than on the Disk. First step though is going to be to buy a large disk and probably two large disks. One for the image and one for the recovered data.