xyem: It's a backup in case of physical drive failure, it is not a backup for the many other things that cause data loss. Everything the originals are subject to, the "RAID copy" is subject to as well. Accidental deletions? Copied instantly. Malware introduced? Copied instantly. Malevolent intrusion? Copied instantly. Even the drive containing the originals failing can cause the drive failure of the copy, as the second disk can fail under the strain of rebuilding (which is one reason why you are not supposed to use similar disks).
-----------------------------------
RAID0 would also allow you to have more on the same system (and make read operations faster too) but the failure of either drive would render all data inaccessible. Fun fun!
I have RAID1 on my three main machines (2 desktops and server) only to stop a drive failure taking the machine offline. My backups are similar to yours as they are not full disk images, but do contain everything important.
----------------------------
The problem being that he doesn't know if it is malware related and every write to the disk could be causing him to lose more and more data. When your data is at risk, you always go from the most conservative options first..
Similar as in size or brand? Just curious.
---------------------------
I would probably go RAID if I was a bit more well off and had IMPORTANT data(to me game saves are sorta important but not exceedingly so, and I don't store personal important data on the system....preferring pen and paper of a sort.), but I don't see a need to at the moment, is all.
-------------------------------
This is just me, but from what he described it sounds like it's either malware or a physical disc malfunction more than your idea, though. But we won't know who's right unless he can get an accurate scan of the system done and analysis of the proper types performed.
I think he should try making copies of his important data first (as you and others said), if he's worried about it and wants to be safe.....then he can do whatever to the disc without too much more worry I would think.
DukeNukemForever: He should do that in any case now, but it's unnecessary to run an infected system and attach other writable devices to it. There is always a risk that the virus scanner can't find the virus.
MWB has been pretty spot on at finding infections/malware when it runs properly, and if that's not enough running another scanner afterwards can usually mitigate most of the remaining grey area of doubt(that the first scanner missed something.). Still, to copy his data he has to use that or a buttload of DVDs. Either way has it's disavantages.