F4LL0UT: It's not ridiculous, it's reasonable. It would be idiotic if they hadn't released the Witcher games on Steam because of being too proud or something. I bet they got most of the sales on Steam. Not to mention that The Witcher 1 is older than GOG.
gameon: They probably got more sales from it. But i don't understand why they would put stuff on a rivals site. It's almost like helping them out.
Sony used to make games on the nintendo gameboy. That would not happen in this day and age.
While CDPRed and GOG are part of the same company, the are actually separate and the decision of where to sell a game is not necessarily theirs. In the case of The Witcher, Atari was the publisher that decided where it would go, while The Witcher 2 was self-published by CDPRed. For a relatively small publisher like CDPRed, getting a game like that into as many stores as possible is simply good business.
gameon: Good grief, console addons were a bad idea. I think even the N64 tried it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_64DD amok: Did not Play Station start out as an addon Sony was making for Nintendo, but then Nintendo went back on the deal - and Sony decided to turn it into a console to recoup the R&D costs ?
Yup.