Momo1991: Yes, agreed on many of your points... Women could be more aggressive in their pursuit of achievement, men could also be more aggressive in pursuing the arts typically attributed to women. Each of us brings our own talents to the table but the table might be higher or more difficult to climb and those that need help with that climb deserve help - wouldn't you agree? Can men bring their talents to typically female pursuits and vice versa? Yes! Don't men deserve to be respected when they actively pursue the intimate details of raising their children in the same way women deserve to be respected for actively pursuing the protection of their country? Yes!
Yes, as long as we understand and accept that it won't change some statistical realities about the greater presence of certain genders for certain roles.
The goal here is not to make the ratios a perfect 50/50 in all fields, but rather not make gender minorities in various professions feel like the odd person out.
Momo1991: All I'm saying is that this is a process - not some finite thing that will be solved by anger but rather understanding and sometimes a specific boost to those attempting to climb atop the table when everything in society tells them - "Hey, that table isn't for you because you are X or Y or Z"
You don't need to tell me, we have state subvention-ed tuition here which paid for at least 2/3 of my university.
The distinction is that it applies to EVERYONE here. It is an inclusive benefit, not an exclusive one.
Momo1991: And I don't think giving a small (and it is very small for three months of living expenses in NYC) stipend to females in order to encourage them to enroll in an amazingly supportive environment for programmers is exactly cause for pitchforks... Srsly, you seem to have missed the point - 90% of programmers are male. Hacker School wants to be inclusive. It wants to change this percentage. Don't you think that's a good idea?
No, I think it's trying to hard to make genders the same (they aren't) and it's a divisive benefit.
Even scholarships based on high marks bug me, but not as much as this (at least, it's based on merit).
That being said, it's their money so... I tend to be up-in-arms more when the government does it with tax payers' money.
Momo1991: An interesting article about how women were effectively shut out of the programming field - I'm not trying to be inflammatory but history - you can't exactly deny it but you can do something about it by considering how "we", and by this I mean men and women, you and me, can change it...
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2013/10/computer-programming-used-to-be-womens-work Given the current slant and my personal observation, I'd say it's more than just men keeping women out.
It's probably not the most politically correct thing to say, but I think that on average, women don't find programming as interesting as men. I'm not saying they are inferior at it, just that the interest isn't there a lot of the time.
There are obviously exceptions and women that like programming should be given the same opportunity as their male counterpart, but the reserve should also be true.