It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Smannesman: Wasn't the Titan line always pretty insane?
avatar
Neobr10: It was pretty good back when it was released, but it became obsolete in a few months once AMD released the R290x which had the same performance as a Titan for half the price. The U$999 price tag on the first Titan was never justified, to be honest.
Well I was talking about the pricetag, not the card itself.
I would never buy the 'best' graphics card of the moment anyway.
avatar
JudasIscariot: I am soooo suggesting to the folks in charge of the purse strings here just to see their facial expressions :D

"Could we have 2...for the test lab?"
So even as a company these things are expensive for you guys? I would have thought that quadro/firepros and other $5,000+ cards would be in line with your business budget.
avatar
Neobr10: Not a surprise. The GTX Titan was never meant to be a gaming video card. Seriously, 12GB VRAM? No game will use that much in the near future, not even in 4K.

But yeah, nvidia's price tags are fucking insane. A GTX 780 Ti costs around U$150-U$200 more than a R290x and the difference in performance between the two is irrelevant.
It is because the market for Titan cards is willing to pay that price, and because gamers who are bewildered by the price do not see that the market is not them. Titan buyers aren't buying frames per second. They're buying gigaflops per cubic centimeter.

AMD cards are not competitive in double precision floating point. Also, they don't run CUDA, which remains nVidia proprietary. But the users of GPU supercomputing are 80 percent CUDA.

So nVidia can charge what they want for those cards, and get it, because in their market they are the only game in town.
Post edited March 25, 2014 by cjrgreen
I don't think I need it, but I feel the urge to buy it .
avatar
cjrgreen: It is because the market for Titan cards is willing to pay that price, and because gamers who are bewildered by the price do not see that the market is not them. Titan buyers aren't buying frames per second. They're buying gigaflops per cubic centimeter.

AMD cards are not competitive in double precision floating point. Also, they don't run CUDA, which remains nVidia proprietary. But the users of GPU supercomputing are 80 percent CUDA.

So nVidia can charge what they want for those cards, and get it, because in their market they are the only game in town.
That's why i said that the Titan never made sense as a gaming card. I know there is a market for it, i never said there wasn't. But i still think nvidia's prices are out of this world. Look at the GTX 780 Ti: it's a video card targeted at gaming, unlike the Titan, and it costs U$200 more than it's competitor for an irrelevant performance difference.
Waiting for Crytek to make the next Crysis game requiring that card.
avatar
JudasIscariot: I am soooo suggesting to the folks in charge of the purse strings here just to see their facial expressions :D

"Could we have 2...for the test lab?"
How else could you properly test Grim Fandango for release?

Insta-buy, as far as I'm concerned :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: I am soooo suggesting to the folks in charge of the purse strings here just to see their facial expressions :D

"Could we have 2...for the test lab?"
avatar
MaximumBunny: So even as a company these things are expensive for you guys? I would have thought that quadro/firepros and other $5,000+ cards would be in line with your business budget.
It's not just the cost, it's the fact that there's no real point in adding it to a test machine in case 1 person on this site decides to buy one of these bad boys.
avatar
Neobr10: Not a surprise. The GTX Titan was never meant to be a gaming video card. Seriously, 12GB VRAM? No game will use that much in the near future, not even in 4K.

But yeah, nvidia's price tags are fucking insane. A GTX 780 Ti costs around U$150-U$200 more than a R290x and the difference in performance between the two is irrelevant.
avatar
cjrgreen: It is because the market for Titan cards is willing to pay that price, and because gamers who are bewildered by the price do not see that the market is not them. Titan buyers aren't buying frames per second. They're buying gigaflops per cubic centimeter.

AMD cards are not competitive in double precision floating point. Also, they don't run CUDA, which remains nVidia proprietary. But the users of GPU supercomputing are 80 percent CUDA.

So nVidia can charge what they want for those cards, and get it, because in their market they are the only game in town.
That's true, but CUDA is so last year, I'm much more bullish on OpenCL if they can get it adopted, just because it has a lot more potential. CUDA is cute, but being so reliant on one vendor is a bad idea. Which is probably part of why it was created in the first place.
Post edited March 25, 2014 by hedwards
Perfect for playing Dosbox games :o

But, really, I'm looking forward to the GTX 870.
Gat-daym... just for a video card? You can buy a whole beast of a machine for that kind of money!
avatar
hedwards: It's not just the cost, it's the fact that there's no real point in adding it to a test machine in case 1 person on this site decides to buy one of these bad boys.
Oh, was it a joke at compatibility with GOG games/users? I would have missed that context completely. :P
Dayum, so this is what we need to run DirectX12 then? ;)

Hmm, may need quad SLI set up to run Terraria :D
I'm in. Thanks for a very generous giveaway!

Cheers.
Oooh baby! Be the first to have QUAD SLI of these scrumptious little beauties and be the reason your city to have rolling black outs. :D





MOAR POWER TO THE SHIELDS!!! :D
avatar
JudasIscariot: I am soooo suggesting to the folks in charge of the purse strings here just to see their facial expressions :D

"Could we have 2...for the test lab?"
I might need two for TW3.
Post edited March 25, 2014 by scampywiak