It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I would guess this has something to do with CD Projekts distribution business and not GoG.
Though Sega might very well be a possible publisher. Pretty much all their old PC-games have been republished by Empire Interactive in Europe (through their Xplosiv-label), so maybe there's a connection there.
Okay, so now we know the first two publishers of the trifecta, Empire and TopWare, what could the third one possibly be?
avatar
cogadh: Okay, so now we know the first two publishers of the trifecta, Empire and TopWare, what could the third one possibly be?

Come on EIDOS!!! And I hope to God, they manage to snag Project Eden if they get EIDOS.
Post edited March 17, 2009 by JudasIscariot
avatar
cogadh: Okay, so now we know the first two publishers of the trifecta, Empire and TopWare, what could the third one possibly be?
avatar
JudasIscariot: Come on EIDOS!!!
you mean Square Enix.
avatar
JudasIscariot: Come on EIDOS!!!
avatar
Weclock: you mean Square Enix.

LA LA LA LA LA! I cannot hear you errr read your text that is! LA LA LA LA LA
I deny the existence of Square Enix the way a Holocaust denier denies the fact that the Holocaust ever happened...
Do you think there are holocaust denier deniers?
Eidos, square enix, squedos or whoever could be good, Eidos made some shithot games, most of which I'd buy. Hell I'd be one of the first in line for Tomb Raider Angel Of Darkness simply because I never got it. I know its crap but I still haven't played it and I wanna
I've still got my hopes up for lucasarts or EA because their past is littered with gold, sure its stained with poo nowdays but wash it off and give it a good polish and the gold will be just as pretty and shiny as it used to be.
avatar
Aliasalpha: Do you think there are holocaust denier deniers?
Eidos, square enix, squedos or whoever could be good, Eidos made some shithot games, most of which I'd buy. Hell I'd be one of the first in line for Tomb Raider Angel Of Darkness simply because I never got it. I know its crap but I still haven't played it and I wanna
I've still got my hopes up for lucasarts or EA because their past is littered with gold, sure its stained with poo nowdays but wash it off and give it a good polish and the gold will be just as pretty and shiny as it used to be.

If it was LA or EA then GOG would not drop a single hint for fear of scaring them away or something sort of how hunters don't want to scare deer by not moving for hours in some damn tree stand.
Also, if LA was to get on here what are the chances of there being a netwide singularity as GOGgers the world over start downloading the games because they want them and because they might be afraid they might get pulled?
I'm going to break from tradition (Lucasarts! LucasArts! C'mon Lucasarts!) and guess ActiBlizzVivenSierravision, since I can't really think of a bigger publisher that GOG would want to hold off on announcing until GDC... other than LucasArts
it still could be id.
Or Infogrames/Atari.
avatar
Wolfox: Or Infogrames/Atari.
that'd be hilarious if it was Valve, not going to happen though.
I vote for ValuSoft, personally. Who can resist such classics as Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader and American Girl: Julie Saves The Eagles?
Could it be Midway? They could definitely use the cash right now...
Midway = meh. Gimme EIDOS already :-).
avatar
JudasIscariot: If it was LA or EA then GOG would not drop a single hint for fear of scaring them away or something sort of how hunters don't want to scare deer by not moving for hours in some damn tree stand.

Yeah but what hints have been dropped? Unless I've missed some, the only thing is that there's an announcement sometime during the GDC next week and that the publisher is "big". The quotes to me imply a double meaning which was why I was thinking Massive Entertainment