CraigGamerPsycho: Well, everyone I know keeps their wireless router/router online all the time - as in even when you're not using it. Unless you have some shabby ISP, the chances of your line having maintenance or downtime is like twice a year? (if that).
Personally, I leave my internet online all the time. When no ones at home, when people are asleep.
The future is digital and is always online. Forget DRM for a second, but ultimately if you want to continue enjoying this form of entertainment you have to accept 'always online'. Exclude limit machine installs out of this equation for a second... let's concentrate on 'awlays onloine'.... when it is applied to a game as DRM it shouldn't matter as people should be always online anyway (in this day and age). Otherwise it's like having someone wanting to enjoy HD digital tv yet doesn't want to switch their Radio for a HD T.V...
Get with the times.
OldFatGuy: No, no one has to "accept" always online. It's always a "CHOICE" to accept it or not. No one is forced to buy a game that requires always on line.
And if enough gamers CHOOSE not to accept that, and refuse purchase, then they WILL change their policy. That's the way the whole customer/businsess relationship is supposed to work. The consumer decides what they'll let the business get away with, and the business will then go as far as they can until it's no longer profitable to do so.
So, if you CHOOSE to "accept" always online as a requirement, then you're enabling the publishers to go ahead and make that the norm. There is nothing inevitable about it at all. If they try this for more and more titles and see their sales drop drasctially, they will drop the idea. If they try this and see their sales mostly continue unabated, then they'll continue and consider other possibly more intrusive measures. The end result is not inevitable, and it is not up to the game sellers to decide that ultimate outcome. It's up to every game purchaser out there to decide it.
Me, I wouldn't purchase it even if I had the most reliable and free internet service in the world, because I know my actions would help determine that always on does become the end result and that will harm others.
You're free to choose as you wish. But you're not free to claim the end result is inevitable when it's not.
I think this is the problem of consumer today. They not realize they always have the final say and keep thinking everything is inevitable. It's the action that matters (boycott) rather than words (complain).